Understanding Mgh = 1/2mv^2: Conditions for Equal and Unequal Energy on Slopes

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZGMF - X20A
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the conditions under which gravitational potential energy (mgh) equals kinetic energy (1/2mv^2) when an object descends a slope. It emphasizes that energy conservation principles apply when no non-conservative forces, like friction, are present, allowing for the equality of potential and kinetic energy. If an object is released with initial velocity, the total initial energy includes both potential and kinetic energy, complicating the relationship. In the presence of friction, the decrease in potential energy results in a smaller increase in kinetic energy, as some energy is lost to the surroundings. Overall, energy conservation holds true when friction is absent, but the relationship changes with its presence.
ZGMF - X20A
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I just want to know in what conditions does mgh = 1/2mv^2 when a guy goes down a slope and in what conditions does mgh =/= 1/2mv^2. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
according to COE, (initial)PE + KE = PE + KE(final) so i think that its better to use this instead of your equation.For example,if the object were to be released with some initial velocity,the KE(initial) would not be 0 so total initial energy is mgh+1/2mv^2 instead of mgh.Btw,it is more precise to write change of PE = -change of KE as this shows that energy is conserved.
 
And energy is conserved as long as the are no "non-conservative" forces- i.e. as long as there is no friction.
 
O.o
So when there is no friction P.E = K.E?
 
Yes, decrease in PE= increase in KE and vice versa. If there's friction, decrease in PE= increase in KE + energy 'lost' to surroundings, so increase in KE<decrease in PE.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Conservation of Energy when lifting a box up off the floor
Replies
5
Views
2K
Energy conservation equation to find equation for final velocity
Replies
4
Views
1K
Calculating Velocity of a Sliding Box on an Inclined Ramp
Replies
3
Views
2K
Maximum Height of Ball on U-Shaped Ramp
Replies
17
Views
2K
Calculate the vertical motion of a piece of debris from an explosion
Replies
3
Views
2K
Maximum Angle of a Simple Pendulum with Given Parameters
Replies
3
Views
2K
Inclined Planes, finding final velocity
Replies
6
Views
2K
Have a problem with this Rotational Motion question
Replies
5
Views
2K
Calculate velocity of block down a ramp using energy conserv
Replies
3
Views
2K
Pendulum Conservation of Energy
Replies
31
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top