Understanding Moments: A Method for Solving Question 2.b.i.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Magic Mushroom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment
AI Thread Summary
To solve question 2.b.i on moments, it is essential to ensure that the sum of the moments of all forces acting on the bar equals zero, including the weight of the bar. Calculating moments about a point other than the pivot can provide clarity, as focusing solely on the pivot may cause confusion. Once the weight of the beam is determined, the reaction at the pivot can be found by summing all forces to achieve equilibrium. Additionally, verifying calculations by checking the sum of all forces can help confirm accuracy. Understanding these methods will aid in effectively addressing the question.
Magic Mushroom
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm having a little trouble with this simple question on moments and I'm wondering if anyone could help me out by giving me a suitable method.
http://www.aqa.org.uk/qual/gceasa/qp-ms/AQA-PHB1-W-QP-JUN05.PDF that is the link and the question is 2.b.i. Please don't give me the answer just the method! :)
Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Magic Mushroom said:
Hi, I'm having a little trouble with this simple question on moments and I'm wondering if anyone could help me out by giving me a suitable method.
http://www.aqa.org.uk/qual/gceasa/qp-ms/AQA-PHB1-W-QP-JUN05.PDF that is the link and the question is 2.b.i. Please don't give me the answer just the method! :)
Thanks in advance.

The sum of the moments of all forces acting on the bar must vanish (including the weight of the bar). Use that fact to obtain the reaction in the pivot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
radou said:
The sum of the moments of all forces acting on the bar must vanish (including the weight of the bar). Use that fact to obtain the reaction in the pivot.
This will work for 2.b.i if the moments are calculated about some point other than the pivot. Perhaps the OP is having difficulty because questions 2.a has them thinking only of moments about the pivot.

Alternatively, once the weight of the beam is known from 2.a.iii the reaction in the pivot can be found by summing all the forces to get zero.
 
OlderDan said:
This will work for 2.b.i if the moments are calculated about some point other than the pivot. Perhaps the OP is having difficulty because questions 2.a has them thinking only of moments about the pivot.

Alternatively, once the weight of the beam is known from 2.a.iii the reaction in the pivot can be found by summing all the forces to get zero.

Of course, I forgot to mention that the point of reduction must not be taken at the pivot. Take the point at the end of the bar and set the sum of all moments equal to zero. Further on, after getting the reaction force of the pivot, you may check on your calculation by setting the sum of all forces (not moments) equal to zero.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top