Understanding Normalized Equations in Wave Function Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tyst
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Normalization of a wavefunction involves adjusting it so that the integral of its complex square equals one, which represents the total probability of finding a particle in a given space. This concept is crucial in quantum mechanics, as it ensures that the wavefunction accurately reflects probability density. Discussions highlight the importance of normalization in solving problems related to wave functions. Understanding this process is essential for tackling more complex quantum mechanics topics. Further exploration of the topic can enhance comprehension and application in related problems.
Tyst
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,
A researcher at my uni has given me a problem which is... rather beyond my poor little first year brain, so I've been doing a whole lot of research and these "normalised" eqations keep popping up, along with people saying they 'won't normalise the eqation' or 'once you've normalised the eqation' etc... (in reference to wave functions if that's relevant). Could someone please enlighten me as to what normalising an equation involves?

I may post the actual problem here a bit later, once i have more of an idea of what I'm doing!

Thanks in advance :-p

-Tyst
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A wavefunction is normalized if the integral of its complex square (over the range of variables) equals 1. Since, in quantum mechanics, the complex square of a wavefunction is interpreted as a probability density, this should make some sense. Read this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/quantum/qm.html#c5
 
ah wicked! thanks Doc :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top