Understanding Particle Degree of Freedom: 3N dof for N Particles Explained

AI Thread Summary
A particle is considered to have three degrees of freedom (dof) due to its translational motion in three-dimensional space. The discussion clarifies that while one might think of including rotational motion, classical mechanics treats particles as having zero spatial extent, rendering rotation about their center of mass irrelevant. Therefore, for N particles, the total degrees of freedom remain at 3N, focusing solely on translational motion. The concept of rotational energy does not apply to infinitesimal particles in classical mechanics. This understanding is crucial for accurately analyzing the dynamics of systems in classical physics.
babbar.ankit
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A particle has 3 degree of freedom (dof) , so we write 3N dof for N particles...
But I have a fundamental doubt: 3 dof means we consider only transitional motion of particle?
... why can't we say 6 dof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because, in classical mechanics, a particle is said to have zero spatial extent, and hence, insofar it rotates about an axis going through its C.M, the whole particle lies on the axis of rotation and thus do not have any rotational energy in addition to its translational energy.

Thus, in classical mechanics, rotation of infinitesemal particles is dynamically irrelevant.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

Redundant degrees of freedom in EM fields?
Replies
1
Views
5K
Degrees of freedom an constraints
Replies
1
Views
2K
How Do Holonomic Constraints Affect Degrees of Freedom in Lagrangian Mechanics?
Replies
3
Views
3K
Mechanisms for multiaxis vibration
Replies
0
Views
690
A Tensor/Vector decomposition/representation & DOF arguement
Replies
2
Views
3K
Degrees of freedom with a particle and a rod
Replies
26
Views
3K
Degrees of Freedom for Rigid Body of n Particles
Replies
2
Views
2K
Problem understanding number of degrees of freedom
Replies
1
Views
2K
Why does a fixed distance reduce degrees of freedom?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Factors that influence depth of field
2
Replies
77
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top