Understanding Phonon Dispersion Relation

Abigale
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

I am learning some solid state physics.

I see a lot of pictures with Phonon Dispersion Relation, with
\omega (\vec{k}) on the y-axis and \Gamma, X, M, \Gamma, R on the x-axis.

I don't understand, why the angular frequenzy \omega (\vec{k}) is important.
Or why is this information important?


THX
Abby
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Phonon dispersions can be measured by inelastic neutron diffraction. Neutrons are fired at a sample and they absorb or emit a phonon, changing their energy by the angular frequency and their momentum by the k value for the phonon.
 
OK, thx.
But I need to talk a little bit more about it for full comprehension ^^


"Phonon dispersions can be measured by inelastic neutron diffraction. Neutrons are fired at a sample and they absorb or emit a phonon",
this means the crystal absorbs a phonon ( so just kinetic energy ) by a neutron.

But how can the sample emit the phonon?

Are these Phonons quantized?
 
yes,the phonos are quantised.They are quanta of vibrational mechanical energy.
 
Abigale said:
I don't understand, why the angular frequenzy \omega (\vec{k}) is important.
Or why is this information important?

I think you are getting lost in the details. Let me give you a bigger picture to always keep in mind.
The reason we care to understand phonons is because they carry and transfer energy. And knowing how and in what capacity they carry energy allows us to calculate the heat capacity and thermal conductivity of any material, which are very important for engineers and applied physicists.

The angular frequency of the phonon is what determines HOW much energy it can carry. The higher its vibration frequency, the more energy it can carry. The dispersion relation allows you to know how many photons there are and how much energy each of them carries. E = \hbar \omega

You will see this eventually when you get to thermal properties and start calculating density of states.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top