Understanding Potential Energy Graphs for Two-Particle Systems

AsadaShino92
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The potential energy V(R) of a two particle system exhibiting oscillatory behavior near a local minimum at the equilibrium separation Ro. V(R)= -(A/R)+(B/R^2) , where R is the interparticle separation.

A) Sketch V(R), what happens to V(R) as R→0
B) At what value of R is there a minima in the potential?
C) For very small oscillations about this equilibrium point, Ro, write the force on the particle F=-k(R-Ro), define k.

Homework Equations


V(R)= -(A/R)+(B/R^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I must apologize in advance because I feel that I'm about to ask a stupid question. But how can I plot this function if I don't know what the values of A and B are?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a good question.

What if you plot ##V## in units of ##A^2/B## and ##R## in units of ##B/A##?

[Edited to correct a mistake.]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
I would have just taken ##A = B = 1## for the purpose of a sketch.
 
TSny said:
It's a good question.

What if you plot ##V## in units of ##A^2/B## and ##R## in units of ##B/A##?

[Edited to correct a mistake.]
Sorry, I'm not sure how I would plot the function in those terms such as A^2/B and B/A. Do you think I can fix the values like PeroK suggested? My only concern is that the function slightly changes based on what A and B are. But I see that the function runs off to infinity as R approaches 0.
 
AsadaShino92 said:
Sorry, I'm not sure how I would plot the function in those terms such as A^2/B and B/A. Do you think I can fix the values like PeroK suggested? My only concern is that the function slightly changes based on what A and B are. But I see that the function runs off to infinity as R approaches 0.
Yes, you can go with PeroK's suggestion. The graph will be the same as I was suggesting.

Note that ##A^2/B## has the dimension of energy and ##B/A## has the dimension of length.

So, you can introduce dimensionless quantities ##\tilde{V} = \frac{V}{A^2/B}## and ##\tilde{R} = \frac{R}{B/A}##.

If you write the equation in terms of these dimensionless quantities ##\tilde{V}## and ##\tilde{R}##, you should find that ##A## and ##B## disappear.

Graphing ##\tilde{V}## versus ##\tilde{R}## will give the same graph as graphing ##V## versus ##R## with ##A= B = 1##.
 
TSny said:
Yes, you can go with PeroK's suggestion. The graph will be the same as I was suggesting.

Note that ##A^2/B## has the dimension of energy and ##B/A## has the dimension of length.

So, you can introduce dimensionless quantities ##\tilde{V} = \frac{V}{A^2/B}## and ##\tilde{R} = \frac{R}{B/A}##.

If you write the equation in terms of these dimensionless quantities ##\tilde{V}## and ##\tilde{R}##, you should find that ##A## and ##B## disappear.

Graphing ##\tilde{V}## versus ##\tilde{R}## will give the same graph as graphing ##V## versus ##R## with ##A= B = 1##.
Thanks for your explanation. I wasn't used to this method so I couldn't see the relationship before. For part B where it asks to find the minimum, taking A=B=1, I found an equilibrium point at R=1. Would it be correct for me to use the first derivative test?
 
AsadaShino92 said:
For part B where it asks to find the minimum, taking A=B=1, I found an equilibrium point at R=1. Would it be correct for me to use the first derivative test?
For A = B = 1, I don't think the equilibrium is at R = 1. But, I'm pretty sure that you are meant to express the equilibrium value of R in terms of A and B.

Yes, use differentiation to find the minimum.
 
TSny said:
For A = B = 1, I don't think the equilibrium is at R = 1. But, I'm pretty sure that you are meant to express the equilibrium value of R in terms of A and B.

Yes, use differentiation to find the minimum.
So then the equilibrium value of R is at R=(B/A)? I found this by leaving A and B as variables and setting V(R)=0.
 
The equilibrium condition is not V(R) = 0. Equilibrium is where the force is zero.
 
  • #10
TSny said:
The equilibrium condition is not V(R) = 0. Equilibrium is where the force is zero.
Since V(R) is given as the potential energy function in the problem, I can find my force function by using F(x)=-du/dx. Is that the right idea?
 
  • #11
AsadaShino92 said:
Since V(R) is given as the potential energy function in the problem, I can find my force function by using F(x)=-du/dx. Is that the right idea?
Yes. Good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K