Understanding Potential Energy Graphs for Two-Particle Systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the potential energy function V(R) for a two-particle system, defined as V(R) = -(A/R) + (B/R^2). Participants explore how to graph this function without specific values for A and B, suggesting the use of dimensionless quantities to simplify the process. They clarify that the equilibrium point is found where the force is zero, not where V(R) equals zero, and emphasize the importance of using differentiation to locate the minimum of the potential energy. The conversation concludes with confirmation that the force can be derived from the potential energy function by applying the relationship F(x) = -dV/dx.
AsadaShino92
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The potential energy V(R) of a two particle system exhibiting oscillatory behavior near a local minimum at the equilibrium separation Ro. V(R)= -(A/R)+(B/R^2) , where R is the interparticle separation.

A) Sketch V(R), what happens to V(R) as R→0
B) At what value of R is there a minima in the potential?
C) For very small oscillations about this equilibrium point, Ro, write the force on the particle F=-k(R-Ro), define k.

Homework Equations


V(R)= -(A/R)+(B/R^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I must apologize in advance because I feel that I'm about to ask a stupid question. But how can I plot this function if I don't know what the values of A and B are?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a good question.

What if you plot ##V## in units of ##A^2/B## and ##R## in units of ##B/A##?

[Edited to correct a mistake.]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeroK
I would have just taken ##A = B = 1## for the purpose of a sketch.
 
TSny said:
It's a good question.

What if you plot ##V## in units of ##A^2/B## and ##R## in units of ##B/A##?

[Edited to correct a mistake.]
Sorry, I'm not sure how I would plot the function in those terms such as A^2/B and B/A. Do you think I can fix the values like PeroK suggested? My only concern is that the function slightly changes based on what A and B are. But I see that the function runs off to infinity as R approaches 0.
 
AsadaShino92 said:
Sorry, I'm not sure how I would plot the function in those terms such as A^2/B and B/A. Do you think I can fix the values like PeroK suggested? My only concern is that the function slightly changes based on what A and B are. But I see that the function runs off to infinity as R approaches 0.
Yes, you can go with PeroK's suggestion. The graph will be the same as I was suggesting.

Note that ##A^2/B## has the dimension of energy and ##B/A## has the dimension of length.

So, you can introduce dimensionless quantities ##\tilde{V} = \frac{V}{A^2/B}## and ##\tilde{R} = \frac{R}{B/A}##.

If you write the equation in terms of these dimensionless quantities ##\tilde{V}## and ##\tilde{R}##, you should find that ##A## and ##B## disappear.

Graphing ##\tilde{V}## versus ##\tilde{R}## will give the same graph as graphing ##V## versus ##R## with ##A= B = 1##.
 
TSny said:
Yes, you can go with PeroK's suggestion. The graph will be the same as I was suggesting.

Note that ##A^2/B## has the dimension of energy and ##B/A## has the dimension of length.

So, you can introduce dimensionless quantities ##\tilde{V} = \frac{V}{A^2/B}## and ##\tilde{R} = \frac{R}{B/A}##.

If you write the equation in terms of these dimensionless quantities ##\tilde{V}## and ##\tilde{R}##, you should find that ##A## and ##B## disappear.

Graphing ##\tilde{V}## versus ##\tilde{R}## will give the same graph as graphing ##V## versus ##R## with ##A= B = 1##.
Thanks for your explanation. I wasn't used to this method so I couldn't see the relationship before. For part B where it asks to find the minimum, taking A=B=1, I found an equilibrium point at R=1. Would it be correct for me to use the first derivative test?
 
AsadaShino92 said:
For part B where it asks to find the minimum, taking A=B=1, I found an equilibrium point at R=1. Would it be correct for me to use the first derivative test?
For A = B = 1, I don't think the equilibrium is at R = 1. But, I'm pretty sure that you are meant to express the equilibrium value of R in terms of A and B.

Yes, use differentiation to find the minimum.
 
TSny said:
For A = B = 1, I don't think the equilibrium is at R = 1. But, I'm pretty sure that you are meant to express the equilibrium value of R in terms of A and B.

Yes, use differentiation to find the minimum.
So then the equilibrium value of R is at R=(B/A)? I found this by leaving A and B as variables and setting V(R)=0.
 
The equilibrium condition is not V(R) = 0. Equilibrium is where the force is zero.
 
  • #10
TSny said:
The equilibrium condition is not V(R) = 0. Equilibrium is where the force is zero.
Since V(R) is given as the potential energy function in the problem, I can find my force function by using F(x)=-du/dx. Is that the right idea?
 
  • #11
AsadaShino92 said:
Since V(R) is given as the potential energy function in the problem, I can find my force function by using F(x)=-du/dx. Is that the right idea?
Yes. Good.
 
Back
Top