Understanding Probability Density for a Bose-Einstein Condensate

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xgkkp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Qm
Xgkkp
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm going through my problem sheet for my quantum mechanics course, and I've come across something I don't know what it means;

It says that a Bose-Einstein condensate can be described by the wave function:

http://xgkkp.no-ip.com/images/math/PsiCondensate.jpg
Psi(x,t) = sqrt( n(x,t) ) * exp ( i*alpha(x,t) )

It then asks me to find the probability density, which I have (assuming it is equal to the (Sigma = |Psi|^2 = Psi.Psi*), and it came out as:

http://xgkkp.no-ip.com/images/math/sigma.jpg
Sigma = n(x,t)

(I can only assume I am correct with this)

The next part has me stumped - it asks me to "Calculate the probability density as a function of n(x,t) and alpha(x,t), and their derivatives".

What does it mean? Does it mean to re-arrange the wave equation so that the functions n(x,t) and a(x,t) are the subject then calculate the probbability density for them? (and the derivative) or does it mean something else entirely?

Thanks,
Nick

ψασ (testing - I don't know if greek letters work with the browser fonts)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure that both n and alpha are real-valued functions? If alpha is complex then the density would be more complicated.
 
Originally posted by Xgkkp
http://xgkkp.no-ip.com/images/math/PsiCondensate.jpg
Psi(x,t) = sqrt( n(x,t) ) * exp ( i*alpha(x,t) )

It then asks me to find the probability density, which I have (assuming it is equal to the (Sigma = |Psi|^2 = Psi.Psi*), and it came out as:

For some reason, I can't view the images you attached, but I have one suggestion.

Take a closer look at the problem and see if it doesn't say to calculate the probability current density, which is:

j=(some factors)[Ψ*(∂/∂x)Ψ-Ψ(∂/∂x)Ψ*]

That's the only way I can see derivatives coming into it.


edit: typo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
4K
Back
Top