Understanding Proportional Components in Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics-chris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proportionality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on understanding proportional components in mathematical equations, specifically examining the relationships between variables. The equation s = ut + 1/2 at^2 illustrates that s is not proportional to t unless acceleration (a) is zero, as u remains constant. Additionally, the area equation A = πr² confirms that A is proportional to r² due to π being a constant. The conversation concludes that proportionality can vary based on the conditions of the equation, emphasizing the importance of identifying constants and variables.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic equations
  • Familiarity with the concepts of proportionality and constants
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations in physics
  • Ability to manipulate and analyze mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of constants in equations, focusing on how they affect proportional relationships.
  • Explore kinematic equations in depth, particularly the relationships between displacement, velocity, and acceleration.
  • Learn about the concept of direct and inverse proportionality in various mathematical contexts.
  • Investigate real-world applications of proportional relationships in physics and engineering.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying mathematics or physics, educators teaching proportional relationships, and anyone interested in the application of equations in real-world scenarios.

physics-chris
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Looking at a set of equations -how exactly do you work out if one component is proportional to another.


Homework Equations


In the example given s = ut + 1/2 at^2, I am told that s is not proporional to t unless acceleration is zero, because u is a constant.



The Attempt at a Solution


On one of my simpler questions, A=pi r^2, I am assumning that because pi is a constant A must be proportional to r^2 as that is what controlshow big or small A is.

On a second question v = u + at, I thought, as in the example that if acceleration is zero, that the final velocity must be proportional to time because u, the initial velocity, is a constant. But if acceleration is not zero then v is not proportional to t.

If that is correct, are there always (in most equations) some sort circumstances where the components that would be proportional in one circumstance, are not in another?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physics-chris said:
In the example given s = ut + 1/2 at^2, I am told that s is not proporional to t unless acceleration is zero, because u is a constant.
For variable Y to be proportional to variable X just means that if X is increased by some factor, then Y is increased by the same factor. That's only true if the relationship between Y and X can be written like: Y = constant*X.

In this example, s = ut would be an example of proportionality, but s = ut + 1/2 at^2 would not.

The Attempt at a Solution


On one of my simpler questions, A=pi r^2, I am assumning that because pi is a constant A must be proportional to r^2 as that is what controlshow big or small A is.
Right. Here A is proportional to r^2, since A = constant*r^2. (Note that A is proportional to r^2, but not to r.)
 
Thanks- think I've sorted it now
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K