Understanding Proportional Components in Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics-chris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proportionality
AI Thread Summary
To determine if one component is proportional to another in equations, it is essential to analyze the relationships involved. For example, in the equation s = ut + 1/2 at^2, s is only proportional to t when acceleration (a) is zero, as u remains constant. In contrast, the area A = πr^2 shows that A is proportional to r^2, since π is a constant. Additionally, in the equation v = u + at, if acceleration is zero, final velocity v is proportional to time t; otherwise, it is not. Understanding these conditions highlights that proportional relationships can vary based on specific circumstances within equations.
physics-chris
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Looking at a set of equations -how exactly do you work out if one component is proportional to another.


Homework Equations


In the example given s = ut + 1/2 at^2, I am told that s is not proporional to t unless acceleration is zero, because u is a constant.



The Attempt at a Solution


On one of my simpler questions, A=pi r^2, I am assumning that because pi is a constant A must be proportional to r^2 as that is what controlshow big or small A is.

On a second question v = u + at, I thought, as in the example that if acceleration is zero, that the final velocity must be proportional to time because u, the initial velocity, is a constant. But if acceleration is not zero then v is not proportional to t.

If that is correct, are there always (in most equations) some sort circumstances where the components that would be proportional in one circumstance, are not in another?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physics-chris said:
In the example given s = ut + 1/2 at^2, I am told that s is not proporional to t unless acceleration is zero, because u is a constant.
For variable Y to be proportional to variable X just means that if X is increased by some factor, then Y is increased by the same factor. That's only true if the relationship between Y and X can be written like: Y = constant*X.

In this example, s = ut would be an example of proportionality, but s = ut + 1/2 at^2 would not.

The Attempt at a Solution


On one of my simpler questions, A=pi r^2, I am assumning that because pi is a constant A must be proportional to r^2 as that is what controlshow big or small A is.
Right. Here A is proportional to r^2, since A = constant*r^2. (Note that A is proportional to r^2, but not to r.)
 
Thanks- think I've sorted it now
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top