Understanding Purcell's Cube: Attraction to Mass Center?

AI Thread Summary
Purcell's assertion that a cube with constant density does not attract external bodies as if its mass were concentrated at its center challenges common intuitions about gravitational attraction. The discussion highlights that while point masses and spheres exhibit spherically symmetric gravitational fields, a cube does not, allowing observers to distinguish its gravitational influence. The gravitational pull experienced by an object near a cube may vary depending on its position relative to the cube's vertices and edges. This complexity raises questions about how gravitational attraction operates in non-spherical geometries. Understanding these nuances is essential for grasping the principles of gravity as they apply to different shapes.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272
In the Spanish second edition of "Electricity and Magnetism", Berkeley Physics Course, volume II, page 27, Purcell states that a cube with a perfectly constant density does not attract external bodies as if its mass was concentrated in its geometrical center.
However he does not say how does such a cube attract other bodies...

The only thing my intuition tells me is that if I am in front of a cube in such a way that I'm closer to a vertex than any other, I will be more attracted by the vertex than any other part of the cube. However I'm not sure it implies that I'm not attracted by the center of mass of the cube.
The comment from Purcell blows up my intuition.

Can you help me to understand, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


A point mass has a gravitational field that is spherically symmetric.

A sphere also has a gravitational field that is spherically symmetric. So if you're outside the sphere and examining the gravitational field, you wouldn't be able to tell if it is the field of a sphere or a point mass.

A cube's gravitational field is not spherically symmetric does not. So if you're outside the cube and examining the gravitational field, you'll be able to tell that it isn't the gravitational field of a point mass.
 


Thanks a lot to both!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top