Center of gravity in wrong place?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of center of gravity (CG) in relation to gravitational attraction, particularly between a small mass (M) and the Earth. It establishes that while textbooks suggest the CG is at the geometric center due to symmetry, the inverse square law of gravity indicates that M perceives the CG as closer to itself. This discrepancy arises from the gravitational influences of all particles in the Earth and the surrounding universe, including the Moon, which also affects the combined CG of the Earth-Moon system. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these gravitational dynamics, especially in orbital mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational forces and the inverse square law
  • Familiarity with concepts of center of gravity and mass distribution
  • Basic knowledge of orbital mechanics and celestial bodies
  • Proficiency in calculus or university-level physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Newton's laws of motion and their implications on gravitational attraction
  • Explore the concept of gravitational binding energy in binary star systems
  • Learn about the dynamics of the Earth-Moon system and its center of mass
  • Investigate the mathematical proofs of center of gravity in physics textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in understanding gravitational interactions and orbital mechanics.

JohnPage
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Textbooks all say that the center of gravity of an object is the point at which all it's gravitaional effects appear to be concentrated. But that seems to depend on who's checking.

(see atachment)

Imagine a small mass M some distance from the Earth. That mass is attracted simultaneously by all the particles that make up the Earth. At first blush you would think that since the Earth is symetrical, they would average out and the center of gravity is at the geometric center. But that cannot be right.

The gravitaional attraction between M and each particle is an inverse square law. That means that particles that are symmetrically each side of the Earth's center do not average to the center. So as far as M sees it, the center of gravity must be closer to m than the center point, right?

I would have thought this would be a major effect on how M would orbit the Earth. Seems to me that the mass M would see the CG as a ring. The CG would follow M around a circular path around the center point.

What am I missing?
 

Attachments

  • mass.png
    mass.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 511
Physics news on Phys.org
"t first blush you would think that since the Earth is symetrical, they would average out and the center of gravity is at the geometric center. "Newton proved that is the case. The proof is often located in Calculus or University Physics texts. Check it out.
 
JohnPage said:
Imagine a small mass M some distance from the Earth. That mass is attracted simultaneously by all the particles that make up the Earth. At first blush you would think that since the Earth is symetrical, they would average out and the center of gravity is at the geometric center. But that cannot be right.

Correct. But that is talking about something different from the center of gravity of the Earth on its own. You can choose to ignore the gravitational attraction of everything else in the universe (including the moon) or to include it, and it shouldn't be a surprise that the two situations are different.

The moon and Earth both orbit around their combined center of gravity position, whcih is not at the center of the earth.

If the moon was the same size as the Earth the CG of the combined bodies would be half way between the line joining them, and both orbits would follow the same curve around that point. There are system like that which can be observed, for example binary stars.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K