"Understanding Random Process X(t) and Its Sample Realizations

marina87
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Problem statement: Define the random process X(t) = C where C is uniform over [-5,5].

a) Sketch a few sample realizations


I need reassurance that if I do a a few sample realizations of this random process they are all going to look the same. They are going to be an horizontal line with x(t) constant equal to 1/5.

I see how this random process is define and it doesn't depend of time. Its a WSS process
 
Physics news on Phys.org
marina87 said:
Problem statement: Define the random process X(t) = C where C is uniform over [-5,5].

a) Sketch a few sample realizations


I need reassurance that if I do a a few sample realizations of this random process they are all going to look the same. They are going to be an horizontal line with x(t) constant equal to 1/5.

I see how this random process is define and it doesn't depend of time. Its a WSS process

Why would you think that C always comes out equal to 1/5?
 
Ray Vickson said:
Why would you think that C always comes out equal to 1/5?

Because I understood that C is a random variable with uniform distribution over [-5,5]. The PDF is 1/(5-(-5)). That is 1/10 and not 1/5.
 
marina87 said:
Because I understood that C is a random variable with uniform distribution over [-5,5]. The PDF is 1/(5-(-5)). That is 1/10 and not 1/5.

Yes, C~U(-5,5). You are saying that C must always come out equal to either 1/5 (or maybe 1/10)! So, you are saying that C can never equal 3, or -2, or 4.5, or any other number in (-5,5). Do you honestly believe that?
 
Ray Vickson said:
Yes, C~U(-5,5). You are saying that C must always come out equal to either 1/5 (or maybe 1/10)! So, you are saying that C can never equal 3, or -2, or 4.5, or any other number in (-5,5). Do you honestly believe that?

@Ray I was very wrong. If I sketch a sample realization for x(t)=C with C been uniform over [-5,5] I will have for example a realization with a horizontal line in x1(t)=-5 (the y-axis) another realization can be x2(t)=2.5 with a horizontal line in 2.5 from t>=0.

Am I right?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top