Understanding Relativistic Kinematics for Proton-Photon Collisions

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I would be very grateful if anyone would be willing to check my understanding of this stuff as it has been several years since I used it in undergrad calculations.

If a proton and a photon collide head-on with known energies, then the energy in the center of mass frame will be given by the invariant mass E_\mathrm{com} = W. Thus E_\mathrm{com} = \sqrt{(E_\gamma+ E_p)^2-(p_\gamma + p_p)^2} = \sqrt{(E_\gamma+ E_p)^2-\left(E_\gamma + \sqrt{E_p^2 - m_p^2}\right)^2}.

Does this sound reasonable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sure why not, remember that you should have vector p's in the first expression:

E_\mathrm{com} = \sqrt{(E_\gamma+ E_p)^2-(\vec{p}_\gamma + \vec{p}_p)^2}

Just for completeness, then use the fact that they are 'head on'
 
That means you need a minus sign in your last term.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top