Understanding Relativistic Muon Decay and Time Dilation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spurious J
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Muon Relativistic
Spurious J
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Given the lifetime of a muon as 2.197 microseconds, and the rest mass of 105.65MeV, and a total particle energy of 10GeV, I need to calculate how far, in the rest frame, the particle will travel before decay.

Homework Equations


Beta=v/c
Gamma=1/sqrt(1-beta^2)
deltaT'=gamma*deltaT
L'=L/gammaAttempts/Understanding Thus Far

The equations aren't complicated but I can't quite make them mesh with my understanding. If deltaT' is the moving time, dividing it by gamma to get the stationary period will always yield a shorter time amount of time passing for the stationary period; isn't this the opposite of what I want?

And, in order to figure out the total distance traveled, as measured in the rest frame, is it enough to multiply v*t'=L', then multiply by gamma to get the rest frame distance? Do I need to convert the time as well? Or would this lead to too many factors of gamma?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
deltaT is the proper time, the time that an event takes in the same reference frame where the event takes place. Here, deltaT would be 2.197 microseconds, since that's how long the muon thinks it lives.

After getting deltaT' and figuring out v, distance is just v*deltaT'. (In fact, distance is always v*deltaT' in any reference frame as long as v and deltaT' are both measured in said frame.)
 
But if deltaT' is the time frame of the muon, I must divide it by gamma to get the amount of time it'll take in the Earth's reference frame, right?

But that'll yield a smaller number. So, the particle would seem to decay quicker, and thus it's clock would be running fast according to the earth, right? I haven't taken Relativity yet, this is for a nuclear physics class, so I'm just running off of my own research over the years. It seems like the equation makes the wrong clock slow down, and I can't see (though I'm sure I am wrong) where I'm wrong in my understanding.

If deltaT' is 2.19 microseconds, then deltaT is .003 microseconds (gamma=70.66); but shouldn't it be if deltaT' passes 2.19 microseconds at .9999c, then the other observer measures the same event as lasting 154 microseconds?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top