Understanding Relativity: An Introduction for A-Level Students

  • Thread starter Thread starter Al3ks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
Al3ks
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm no scientist but I am learning A-level Maths and Physics, so if there is mathematics involved try not to make it too advanced. Thank You!

If you have a mass (A) in one frame of reference (1) and it is staionary in this frame and is weighed and has a certain mass (x). There is another frame of reference (2) and frame 1 is moving relative to frame 2. If mass A is slowed down to being stationary in frame 2 and is then weighed to give a mass (y) is mass x larger than mass y due to the kinetic energy adding mass? (assume accurate enough instruments or large enough velocities, etc. to make this noticeable)

Thanks
Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x=y.

That is, the mass as measured when the object is stationary in their reference frame is the same. This mass is known as the rest mass of the object (For obvious reasons).
 
OK thanks and if mass y were measured from frame 1 x < y? and vice versa?
 
That's right. The "mass" of the object measured when it is in a different inertial frame is always larger than the rest mass.

Note that physicists generally don't like to say the mass has changed at all, as it is quite confusing. Usually, we refer only to the rest mass of the object and we say that the energy has changed.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top