Understanding Results from a Relativistic Star Ship Calculator

danielgoodman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, first time poster here!

I am trying to understand some results I am getting from this "Relativistic Star Ship Calculator". This site sets up the question I'm trying to answer exactly like I imagined it should (thanks to The Forever War). From the description:

The star ship accelerates continuously from the origin to the midpoint of the mission.
At the midpoint, the ship turns its thrusters to face the destination.
The ship decelerates continuously from the midpoint to the destination.

The way I understood it, if you are accelerating at 1G and hope to come arbitrarily close to the speed of light, it should take (3*10^8 m/s)/(9.8 m/s^2)= ~354 days. Similarly, if you hope to decelerate from such a speed, it will require the same amount of time. So say about 2 years of combined acceleration/deceleration.

Further, I thought that at a velocity which is arbitrarily close to c, your Lorentz Factor becomes arbitrarily high, meaning that light years can be traveled in seconds (or less). So the conclusion I reached is that you can travel virtually any distance in ~2 years if you had a ship that accelerates at 1G and can reach a very high fraction of c.

When inputting large distances in the calculator linked above, I get results that don't fit with my rationale. Example:

Input: Distance: 10 LY
Acceleration: 1G
Output: Time: 4.9 Y
Max Speed: 0.987 c

So this calculator assumes your trip takes 4.9 Y (not 2) and you only reach 0.987 c (not .99999...c)

Can someone explain the fault in my reasoning?

Thanks so much!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
danielgoodman said:
The way I understood it, if you are accelerating at 1G and hope to come arbitrarily close to the speed of light, it should take (3*10^8 m/s)/(9.8 m/s^2)= ~354 days.
Velocities do not add that way. That would be true under Galilean relativity, but not Special relativity. (See: How Do You Add Velocities in Special Relativity?)

The longer the acceleration is applied, the less affect it has on the speed with respect to the original frame. (Note that the acceleration is measured from an inertial frame co-moving with the rocket at any moment--not with respect to the original frame.)

After one year (in rocket time) of accelerating at g, your speed would be only about .77c. (See: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html)

Further, I thought that at a velocity which is arbitrarily close to c, your Lorentz Factor becomes arbitrarily high, meaning that light years can be traveled in seconds (or less).
That's true.
So the conclusion I reached is that you can travel virtually any distance in ~2 years if you had a ship that accelerates at 1G and can reach a very high fraction of c.
The problem is that you are not going as fast as you think. It takes a while to reach a really high speed at that acceleration.
 


Thanks Doc Al, I'll read those links. I'm kind of miffed that I made it out of my Physics course (which covered special relativity) without understanding that bit. Anyway, good to know!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top