Understanding Solar Radiation Force: Maths & Derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the mathematical derivation of solar radiation force, particularly how photons transfer momentum to dust particles. It is noted that the flux of photons can be calculated using the formula L/4πr². The proposed formula for the force on a spherical particle considers the particle's radius, the photon flux, and the fraction of photons absorbed. However, the concept of a "force" from a single photon is debated, as force is typically a continuous application, while photon absorption involves momentum transfer. The key takeaway is that the momentum change from photon absorption can be calculated using Planck's constant divided by the photon's wavelength, with force being this momentum divided by the absorption duration.
UniPhysics90
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm having a little trouble understanding this, mainly the way the maths behind it works. I can't find any kind of derivation on the internet which is 'simple' and at a level I can understand.

My understanding is that the photons from the Sun are absorbed by dust, so transferring momentum from the photon to the 'dust'

I know that

Flux of photons = L/4*pi*r2

I THINK that

Force on a spherical particle of radius a = (pi*a2)*flux*fraction absorbed*force due to a single photon


Is this correct? If it is, what is the force due to a single photon?

Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Talking about the 'force' of a single photon is not very meaningful. After all, force is something that you continuously apply, the absorption of a photon of course has some duration, but I hve no clue what that would be. What you can calculate is the difference in momentum due to the photon absorption (which is just the momentum of the photon, the constant of Planck divided by its wavelength).

If you would speak of the force of this photon it is just this momentum divided by the duration of the absorption.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top