Understanding Spin in Composite Systems

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Suppose you have an electron and a proton, which both can have either spin up or down. The possible combinations are:

\uparrow\downarrow, \downarrow\uparrow, \uparrow\uparrow, \downarrow\downarrow

But for some reason my book only allows a linear combination of the two first since they both have m=0 with the argument that m should advance in integer steps. Now this is a bit weird for me, wasn't that a rule applying for each electrons spin that we are now using on the total spin of the system - how can we just do that? It seems for me that we should either choose that the rule that the spin number advances in integer steps for each electrons spin or for the total spin - because doesn't it create problems for either if we choose both?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The latter two cases are an excited hydrogen atom. Maybe your book considered only non-excited atoms, that's why it was restricted to the former two cases.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top