Understanding Static Equilibrium in a Scaffold Setup

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a static equilibrium problem involving a uniform plank and a painter's weight. The plank, resting on two scaffold bars, tips when the painter walks beyond a certain point, calculated to be 0.684 m from the edge. A question arises about the omission of the normal reaction force from the other scaffold in the equilibrium calculations. It is clarified that while the normal force does contribute to the system, it becomes irrelevant once the plank begins to tip. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of understanding the equilibrium dynamics involved.
Kenny Lee
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
The problem is stated as follows:

A uniform plank with a length of 6.00 m and mass 31.0 kg rests horizontally across two horizontal bars of a scaffold. The bars are 4.50 m apart, and 1.50 m of the plank hangs over one side of the scaffold.
How far can a painter with a mass of 68.0 kg walk on the overhanging part of the plank before it tips?

Its a simple problem. We just fix up an equation that describes eqbm about the second scaffold (from the man and the center of mass) and we get a result of 0.684...

But I was wondering why we don't consider the normal reaction at the other scaffold? Shouldn't there be an upwards force contributing towards an ACW moment at that point... why don't we include it in calculations? I need help. Anyone please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because when the painter starts going at certain distance the Planck won't be supported by that scaffold, it'll start lifting, but still in equilibrium at a certain position of the painter in the Planck.
 
Thanks for replying!

Yea, I think I get it now. thanks.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

How Far Can a Person Walk on a Plank Before It Tips?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Finding the Center of Mass of a Suspended Scaffold and Paint Cans System
Replies
4
Views
2K
Why is there a vertical force on the pin in this static equilibrium setup?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Could you please validate my answer?
Replies
7
Views
3K
Magnetic Field required to hold a loop in static equilibrium
Replies
5
Views
5K
Static equilibrium and tension problem
Replies
5
Views
4K
Static Equilibrium: holding a sign
Replies
5
Views
2K
Solving an Equilibrium Problem Involving Torque: Need Help!
Replies
7
Views
3K
What Is the Tension in the Right End Cable of Scaffold 1?
Replies
1
Views
3K
How Far Can a Painter Safely Walk on an Overhanging Plank Before It Tips?
Replies
14
Views
12K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top