Understanding Summation Notation

y35dp
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I know this should be easy and the answer will be glaringly obvious in hindsight but my brain is fried and I can't for the life of me figure this out. My problem is this I have a function as follows;

V = \sum\lambdai,j,k hihjhk (summation over i,j,k where i,j,k = 1,2,3)

I can't work out if this is

V = \lambda1,1,1h13 + \lambda1,1,2h12h2 + ... + \lambda2,3,1h2h3h1 +...

with every permutation of 1, 2 and 3, this should be simple as it is taken as a given in my problem but it is driving me insane.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, what you have so far is correct. And, since there are 3 indices and each can take on 3 values, there will be 3^3= 27 terms in the sum.
It would help to have a "process" for working through them- I recommend changing the last index through 1, 2, 3, then the next, etc.- just like an odometer turns over in a car.

i,j,k= 1,1,1; 1,1,2; 1,1,3; 1,2,1;1,2,2; 1,2,3; 1,3,1; 1,3,2; 1,3,3;
will be the first 9 terms.
The next 9 will be exactly the same but with first number 2 and the last 9 with first number 3.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you, you may just have rescued my mental health
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top