Medical Understanding Temporary Blindness from Color-Changing Walls

  • Thread starter Thread starter PIT2
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phenomenon of "receptor fatigue," which occurs when photoreceptors in the eye are continuously stimulated by a specific wavelength of light, leading the brain to temporarily ignore signals from that wavelength. This was highlighted by an observation of an illuminated wall at a casino that changed colors, causing temporary blindness when shifting from green to red. The experience is likened to the adaptation response seen in temperature sensations, such as feeling hot water after being in the cold. The discussion encourages readers to conduct their own experiments, such as staring at colored dots and then shifting focus to a blank sheet of paper, to observe the effects of adaptation firsthand. This exploration of visual and sensory adaptation emphasizes the brain's ability to adjust to prolonged stimuli.
PIT2
Messages
897
Reaction score
2
The other day i was looking at a big illuminated wall on the side of a casino. The light came from inside the wall and changed colors in many different ways. I noticed that when the wall was fully green and then faded to fully red, that i was blind for about 2 or 3 seconds.

Why would that happen?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Well, try dipping a hand in hot water and the other in cold water. Now switch. Look at a picture of a streetlight and then look at a white paper. Notice anything different?
 
I should notice that the light wasnt very bright, about the same as a tv.
 
What Moridin is suggesting is that you consider a phenomenon often called "receptor fatigue" in textbooks, which is a bit of misnomer, as it's actually an adaptation response. When the photoreceptors in the eye are stimulated continuously by one wavelength, your brain starts to "ignore" the signals for that wavelength and only sees the other wavelengths in the visible spectrum. It sounds like somehow, the lights you were looking at were timed just appropriately to fatigue both the red and green responses before fully recovering from the first, so that you were briefly insensitive to most colors.

Try the example Moridin suggested...don't make assumptions of the results...try it for yourself and see what really happens. You can just draw some large dots on a piece of paper to create the effect without needing a picture of anything in particular. Draw a pattern of four dots...red, green, blue, yellow (or just red and blue for simplicity if all you have are ballpoint pens for drawing in color), stare at it for 20 - 30 seconds, then immediately shift your focus to a blank sheet of white paper.

The reason he suggests trying the hot and cold water experiment is that the concept is the same for temperature sensation as for photoreceptors, in that you'll experience adaptation (you may have already noticed this if you've spent a lot of time outside on a cold day, and then come inside to wash your hands...have you noticed that even just cold water from the tap feels very hot under those conditions?)
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top