Understanding the 3rd Law of Motion: Solving a Common Homework Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter harp AP 2010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Motion
AI Thread Summary
When pulling on a rope tied to a box, the box exerts an equal and opposite force, but movement occurs due to the difference in mass and friction. The greater mass of the person allows them to exert more force, overcoming the box's resistance. The acceleration of the box is influenced by the person's mass, as described by the equation a = F/m. On a frictionless surface, the person would move closer to the box unless they found a way to gain traction. Understanding these principles clarifies how motion can occur despite the third law of motion.
harp AP 2010
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If I pull forward on a rope tied to a box, and the box pulls back equally, how do we move at all?

Homework Equations


I think I'm over thinking this, but if my actions have equal and opposite reactions how does anything happen?

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, you move because of your mass, since it is greater than the box the box moves..

3rd law says F12 = -F21

and F= ma

so you see that the more mass you have the more force you exert, overwhelming the opposite force of the box

edit: hmm..i think I'm wrong i think it's because of the acceleration, since a = F / m , the more mass you have the less you accelerate, so the box accelerates more and it moves..but I'm not an expert on this..
 
You manage to move the box by digging in your feet with more resistance than the box can muster from its friction with the ground. Imagine doing this on a frictionless surface (ice rink, say). You would just close the distance between you and the box unless you turn your skates round to obtain purchase on the ice.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top