Understanding the Center of Mass in a Hemispherical Bowl in Equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the center of mass (c.o.m) of a uniform hemispherical bowl in equilibrium when a mass is placed on its rim. The key point is the justification for the center of the circular rim being vertically aligned with the point of contact on the table. It is established that the table is tangent to the hemisphere's surface, making the line from the center of the hemisphere to the contact point perpendicular to the table. The participant expresses confusion over this concept, despite successfully calculating the c.o.m of the combined system. The conversation emphasizes the importance of grasping fundamental principles in physics to solve equilibrium problems effectively.
Helena54321
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I know and understand why the c of m of a uniform hemispherical shell (i.e a hollow hemisphere) is r/2 on the axis of symmetry (where r=radius of shell). I looked at the solution of the following question and still don't understand.

Question:

A hemispherical bowl, which may be modeled as a uniform hemispherical shell, has mass 3kg. A mass of of 2kg is placed on the rim and the bowl rests in equilibrium on a smooth horizontal plane. The plane surface of the bowl makes an angle theta with the horizontal. Show that tan theta= 4/3.

Answer: Taking moments about S (the point of contact with the table) :

3g x (r/2)sintheta= 2g x rcostheta.

My problem is I don't understand/know the justification for 0 (the centre of the circular rim of the shell) being on the same vertical line that passes through the point of contact with the horizontal table S.

I first considered the two masses into a composite body and worked out the centre of mass (0.4r, 0.3r) where x-axis is the plane of the circular rim and the y-axis the axis of symmetry of the bowl. This obviously yields the correct answer. But in order to even get this you need to know/understand that 0 is directly above S. Why does this have to be the case?

Can anybody help me? :/ x pweese x

It's in the edexcel M3 book. Exercise 5C Qstn 12. baa humbug
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Helena54321 said:
My problem is I don't understand/know the justification for 0 (the centre of the circular rim of the shell) being on the same vertical line that passes through the point of contact with the horizontal table S.
Would you agree that the table is tangent to the surface of the hemisphere, regardless of where contact is made? And thus a line drawn between the center of the sphere and the point of contact must be perpendicular to table?
 
Man am I stupid. I never get difficult things misunderstood, it's always the easy obvious most important things that I don't see.

THANK YOU! merci! arrigato! xie xie! dou zie! mgoisi!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top