Understanding the Direction of Electric Fields: A Question of Convention?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the direction of electric fields generated by charges, particularly the convention that electric fields point away from positive charges and toward negative charges. It highlights that while the electric field direction is determined by the nature of the source charge, the force experienced by a test charge depends on its own charge type. The participants debate whether this directional convention is arbitrary, suggesting that if the definitions were reversed, the physical implications would remain unchanged. They also touch on the relationship between electric fields and potential, emphasizing that the convention is crucial for consistency in physics. Ultimately, the conversation concludes that the established conventions, while seemingly arbitrary, are essential for clear communication in the study of electric fields.
carlitos_30
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Hello.

I have a doubt regarding the direccion of the electric field in a point from a source charges. Let be a charge in the left of the plane. In a point to the right of the charge, the direction of the electric field vector is to the right. If the charge is negative, the direction of the electric field vector is to the left.

Why is this? It's just by plain convention?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electric field is simply force per charge. So if equal charges repel each other (and they do), the field to the right of a positive charge points to the right.
 
But, the electric chage in a point in the plane: in the point there is no charge at all! So, how does the principle of equal charges applies here?
 
Same as with the gravitational field (which, however, is exclusively attractive): the field is there even when there is no mass to pull on.
In the point there is no charge at all, ...
but a test charge ##\ q_{\rm test} \ ## would experience a force ##\ \vec F = {\displaystyle \vec E\over \displaystyle q_{\rm test} } \ ## and that determines the electric field.
 
BvU said:
Same as with the gravitational field (which, however, is exclusively attractive): the field is there even when there is no mass to pull on.
but a test charge ##\ q_{\rm test} \ ## would experience a force ##\ \vec F = {\displaystyle \vec E\over \displaystyle q_{\rm test} } \ ## and that determines the electric field.
Only if the test charge is positive. Why it can´t be negative? Just for convention?
 
carlitos_30 said:
Only if the test charge is positive. Why it can´t be negative? Just for convention?
No. Also if the test charge is negative.
 
Except I should have written $$\ \vec F = q_{\rm test} \vec E $$ sorry for the mistypo
 
BvU said:
No. Also if the test charge is negative.
But, with a negative test charge, the electric field vector shoudn't point to the left?
 
It doesn't. The force ##\vec F## points to the left, but the electric field ##\vec E = \displaystyle {\vec F \over q_{\rm test}}\ ## still points to the right
 
  • #10
BvU said:
It doesn't. The force ##\vec F## points to the left, but the electric field ##\vec E = \displaystyle {\vec F \over q_{\rm test}}\ ## still points to the right
I don´t see any reason of the WHY a positive charge generate an electric field outward the positive charge, except for a convention. If we assume that the electric field of a positive charge points inward and a negative charge points outward, it would be just the same as is assumed in the textbooks.
 
  • #11
carlitos_30 said:
I don´t see any reason of the WHY a positive charge generate an electric field outward the positive charge, except for a convention. If we assume that the electric field of a positive charge points inward and a negative charge points outward, it would be just the same as is assumed in the textbooks.
Granted. We could also agree that an electron has a positive charge. It wouldn't change a thing - physically. But confusion is guaranteed.

Further on in the curriculum, the electric field will be minus the gradient (measure of change) of the potential. And it takes work ##qV## to move a charge ##q## from infinity to a place with potential ##V##. Same issue.
 
  • Like
Likes carlitos_30
  • #12
carlitos_30 said:
I don´t see any reason of the WHY a positive charge generate an electric field outward the positive charge, except for a convention. If we assume that the electric field of a positive charge points inward and a negative charge points outward, it would be just the same as is assumed in the textbooks.
Yes, it is just a convention. We could instead use the convention that protons are negative.
 
  • Like
Likes carlitos_30
  • #13
Thanks both for your time and help.
 
Back
Top