Understanding the Effects of Electric and Magnetic Fields on Charged Particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the effects of electric and magnetic fields on charged particles. It clarifies that if a charged particle moves in a straight line, the magnetic field in that region can be considered zero, as there is no force acting on it. The motion of charged particles distinguishes electric fields, which cause straight-line acceleration, from magnetic fields, which result in curved or spiral paths. When a cosmic ray proton approaches Earth, it will not be deflected, while an electron may deflect to the right or left due to the Earth's magnetic field. Overall, understanding the differences in particle behavior in these fields is crucial for solving related physics problems.
Dhooy7
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. If a charged particle moves in a straight line through some region of space, can you say that the

magnetic field in that region is zero? Explain.

2. How can the motion of a charged particle be used to distinguish between an electric field and a

magnetic field?

3. If a cosmic ray proton approaches the Earth from outer space along a line toward the center of the

Earth that lies in the plane of the equator, in what direction will it be deflected by the Earth’s magnetic

field? What about an electron? A neutron?

Homework Equations



1. If a charged particle moves in a straight line though space, you can say that the magnetic field in the region is zero. This is because the cosine of 0 is 0, so the magnetic field is zero. The force is in the same direction as the velocity which creates an angle of 0 degrees. Thus, there is no force.

2. I don't understand this at all. My professor was saying something about affecting the particles e field in a straight line versus curving for the e- field.

3. I don't know where to start on this one to be honest.
[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
3. For number 3, the professor or your book should have told you something about the Earth's core, and knowing that it has a metallic core that creates an electric field of some sort the magnetic poles are created right? So use this information to guide your thinking. Think of the Earth as a great big magnet of some sort, and think of how electrons react in a magnetic field.

2. For number 2, think about what are the main differences between the fields, and how they react to electrons and protons. Refer back to your book for this.
 
2. A charged particle can be used to distinguish between an electric field and a magnetic field because a charged particle that is moving (or not moving right away) in an electric field will be accelerated in the direction of the electric field (straight line). However, a charged particle that is moving in a magnetic field will move in a spiral and curve.

Is number 1 right?

3. It won't be deflected. An electron will go to the right or left?
 
Dhooy7 said:
2. A charged particle can be used to distinguish between an electric field and a magnetic field because a charged particle that is moving (or not moving right away) in an electric field will be accelerated in the direction of the electric field (straight line). However, a charged particle that is moving in a magnetic field will move in a spiral and curve.

Is number 1 right?

3. It won't be deflected. An electron will go to the right or left?

I didn't really read over number 1, but cos(0)=1 so you are wrong with the knowledge you presented, show the equation you used next time.

Also for Number 2, assuming that you are in a conceptual physics class (Paul G. Hewett book maybe?) You should think about how a charged particle reacts in a magnetic field and how it reacts in an electric field and I am confused on what you mean by "spiral", do you mean that it will tend to want to go to one of the poles, if so, then you may be on the right track.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top