Understanding the Electric Field Equation in Electromagnetism

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the electric field equation in electromagnetism, specifically the identity involving the gradient of the distance between two point charges. A participant initially struggles with the derivation but realizes that the expression for the gradient of the distance must hold true for the identity to be valid. They clarify that in spherical coordinates, the gradient simplifies to a specific form. A misunderstanding regarding the dimensionality of vector components is addressed, leading to a corrected understanding of the equation. Ultimately, the participant confirms they have reached the correct result after resolving the confusion.
davidge
Messages
553
Reaction score
21
I was reading a book on Electromagnetism and it's said on deriving the electric field that $$\nabla \frac{1}{|x-x'|} = - \frac{x-x'}{|x-x'|^3}$$ where ##|x-x'|## is the magnitude of the distance between two point charges. I've tried to derive this result and I found that $$\nabla |x-x'| = \frac{x-x'}{|x-x'|}$$ must be true for the first identity to be valid. Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it essentially boils down to ##\nabla r = \vec e_r## in spherical coordinates.
 
  • Like
Likes davidge
Orodruin said:
Yes, it essentially boils down to ∇r=⃗er∇r=e→r\nabla r = \vec e_r in spherical coordinates.
Thanks. Can you point out where I'm wrong?

I'm assuming a Minkowskian metric, so vectors- and covectors- components are equal. So we have ##|x-x'| = \sum_i(x^i - x'^{\ i})^2##. I guess we need some formalism to express ##x-x'##, because it's a vector. Let's say an arbitrary vector can be written as ##V = V^i \partial_i##. Then ##x - x' = (x^i - x'^{\ i})\partial_i ##. We have then $$ \nabla |x-x'| = \frac{x-x'}{|x-x'|} = \sum_i\partial_i[(x^i-x'^{\ i})^2] = \sum_i\frac{(x^i - x'^{\ i})\partial_i}{(x^i - x'^{\ i})^2}$$
If we apply the derivative on the far right-hand-side on ##|x-x'|##, we get a bad result, namely ##(x^i - x'^{\ i}) = 1##. I guess this can't be right..
 
Why are you using ##|\vec x| = x^i x^i##?? This does not even make sense dimensionally. You are missing some square roots ...
 
  • Like
Likes davidge
Orodruin said:
Why are you using |⃗x|=xixi|x→|=xixi|\vec x| = x^i x^i?? This does not even make sense dimensionally. You are missing some square roots ...
Oh yea. I got the correct result now. Thank you.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top