B Understanding the GUT Scale: Merging Fundamental Forces at High Energies

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter nolxiii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gut Scale
nolxiii
Messages
40
Reaction score
5
So I've heard it talked about how how at high energies all the strength of all fundamental forces are expected to merge together to single force, but don't quite get how you get from "all the forces have the same strength at high energies" to "all the forces are really the same force."

Couldn't they have the same strength but still act differently? And if they acted the same at high energies wouldn't their behavior at low energies still differentiate them into separate phenomenon?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nolxiii said:
So I've heard it talked about how how at high energies all the strength of all fundamental forces are expected to merge together to single force, but don't quite get how you get from "all the forces have the same strength at high energies" to "all the forces are really the same force."

You are right, it does not follow. It's just a "maybe", a hint from the data that maybe it's one force.

And if they acted the same at high energies wouldn't their behavior at low energies still differentiate them into separate phenomenon?

We have an example. Electroweak SU(2) force is one force, but at low energies it "breaks" into two seemingly completely different things: W+- bosons are quite different from that part of SU(2) which is part of photons.
 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom
Right on. Still struggling somewhat to build a mental model of how the electroweak symmetry breaking works, the link below I think helped a bit though. Am I understanding this right that if the symmetry just happened to break in such a way that W bosons were (nearly?) massless that the weak and electromagnetic forces would still behave more or less identically?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Forces/unify.html
 
An unbroken SU(2) force would not be identical to electromagnetism.
An unbroken U(1) force is identical to electromagnetism.
 
nikkkom said:
An unbroken SU(2) force would not be identical to electromagnetism.
An unbroken U(1) force is identical to electromagnetism.

what would this unbroken SU(2) force look like?
 
It would be a long-range force, IIRC attractive for any SU(2) charges (unlike electricity, where like charges repel).
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...
Back
Top