Understanding The Importance of Centre of Mass for Balance - Explained by Peter

  • Thread starter Thread starter Don Carnage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balance
AI Thread Summary
The center of mass is crucial for an object's balance, as it determines the stability of equilibrium. When the center of mass is below the object, it creates a stable equilibrium, making it difficult to topple. In contrast, if the center of mass is above the pivot point, the object is in unstable equilibrium and can easily fall. The discussion highlights the role of torque and moments in understanding balance, particularly in scenarios like tightrope walking. Understanding these principles can clarify why certain positions are more stable than others.
Don Carnage
Hi ppl.

Why is it, the "centre of mass" determines how good the balance
of an object is ? I’ve tried this experimentally, on when I place the centre of mass below the object, its nearly impossible to push over, Or well... It IS IMPOSSIBLE! Could someone please tell me which equations tells me about this ?

Thx

Peter:-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don Carnage said:
Why is it, the "centre of mass" determines how good the balance
of an object is ?

The centre of mass is where gravity acts on a body.

It can be further studied if you introduce moments.

Clockwise moments = Anti-clockwise moments

F x d = F x d
 
DM said:
The centre of mass is where gravity acts on a body.

It can be further studied if you introduce moments.

Clockwise moments = Anti-clockwise moments

F x d = F x d

Do you mean angular moments and torque ? I still don't get it.. don't you know an equation ?
 
'angular moments'!
LOL!
 
It depends a bit upon the context, but suppose you are tightrope walking. If you are slightly out of balance (ie, your center of mass is not precisely above the rope), gravity will exert a nonzero net torque to make you fall over to the side completely.
But imagine you are hanging from below the rope (with your arms or something). Now if you swing sideways gravity exerts a torque to restore you to the equilibrium position right beneath the rope (much like a pendulum). The first is an example of unstable equilibrium, the second of stable equilibrium.
For a rigid body in a uniform gravitational field, gravity can be assumed to act on the center (centre?) of mass. If the center of mass is above the turning point (the contact point on the rope in this case) you have an unstable equilibrium, if the center of mass is below the turning point, you have stable equilibrium. You can easily convince yourself of this if you draw a picture and analyze the torques.

This is why tightrope walkers often practice with a long pole to which two long strings with masses are attached, so the the center of mass lies below the rope.
 
Last edited:
Don Carnage said:
Why is it, the "centre of mass" determines how good the balance of an object is ? I’ve tried this experimentally, on when I place the centre of mass below the object, its nearly impossible to push over, Or well... It IS IMPOSSIBLE! Could someone please tell me which equations tells me about this ?
I think you need to revisit what the term "balance" means. Something can be in balance and be easily nocked out of balance by a small force.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top