Understanding the Integral in a Proof: A Closer Look at the Role of Supp and Chi

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the proof of the equality $\int u_j \phi dx = \int (\psi_j \ast u) \phi dx$, emphasizing the role of the characteristic function $\chi(x/j)$ and the support of the function $\phi$. It is established that for a sufficiently large $j$, specifically when $j > M$ where $M$ bounds the support of $\phi$, the integral simplifies due to the properties of the convolution and the support of the involved functions. The conclusion confirms that the equality holds under these conditions, demonstrating the integral's behavior in relation to the characteristic function and the convolution operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integrals and their properties
  • Familiarity with convolution operations, specifically $\psi_j * u$
  • Knowledge of characteristic functions, particularly $\chi(x/j)$
  • Concept of function support, denoted as $\operatorname{supp}(\phi)$
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of characteristic functions in analysis
  • Learn about convolution in the context of functional analysis
  • Explore the implications of function support in integrals
  • Investigate the role of limits in integral convergence
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of analysis, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of integrals and convolutions in functional analysis.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

I am looking at the following proof:View attachment 5454

Why does it hold that $\int u_j \phi dx= \int (\psi_j \ast u) \phi dx$ ?
 

Attachments

  • conc.JPG
    conc.JPG
    24.5 KB · Views: 115
Physics news on Phys.org
We have that $X(\frac{x}{j})=1$ for $|x|<j$, right? And since we pick $j$ sufficiently large, it's like if we had $-\infty<j<+\infty$ and so we have $X(\frac{x}{j})=1$ for all the values of $x$, right?
 
You are correct that $\chi(x/j) = 1$ for $|x| < j$. To proceed, let $M > 0$ such that $\operatorname{supp}(\phi)\subset [-M,M]^n$; choose $j > M$. Then $\phi(x) = 0$ for all $|x| \ge j$. Thus, for all $j > M$,

$$\int u_j\phi\, dx = \int \chi\left(\frac{x}{j}\right)(\psi_j * u)\phi(x)\ dx = \int_{|x| < j} \chi\left(\frac{x}{j}\right)(\psi_j * u)\phi(x)\, dx = \int_{|x| < j} (\psi_j * u)\phi\, dx = \int (\psi_j * u)\phi\, dx$$
 
Euge said:
You are correct that $\chi(x/j) = 1$ for $|x| < j$. To proceed, let $M > 0$ such that $\operatorname{supp}(\phi)\subset [-M,M]^n$; choose $j > M$. Then $\phi(x) = 0$ for all $|x| \ge j$. Thus, for all $j > M$,

$$\int u_j\phi\, dx = \int \chi\left(\frac{x}{j}\right)(\psi_j * u)\phi(x)\ dx = \int_{|x| < j} \chi\left(\frac{x}{j}\right)(\psi_j * u)\phi(x)\, dx = \int_{|x| < j} (\psi_j * u)\phi\, dx = \int (\psi_j * u)\phi\, dx$$

I got it... Thanks a lot! (Smirk)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K