Understanding the Integration of Inverse Trigonometric Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter escryan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of the function \(\int \frac{1}{1+x^{2}} dx\) evaluates to \(\tan^{-1}(x)\) due to the relationship between the derivative of the arctangent function and the secant function. The discussion highlights that using u-substitution with natural logarithms is ineffective in this case because the integral's form directly corresponds to the arctangent function. Key trigonometric identities, such as \(\tan^2(x) + 1 = \sec^2(x)\), are essential for understanding this integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically basic integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with inverse trigonometric functions, particularly \(\tan^{-1}(x)\).
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities, including \(\sin^2(x) + \cos^2(x) = 1\).
  • Experience with implicit differentiation and its applications in calculus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the arctangent function from its integral form.
  • Learn about trigonometric substitutions in integral calculus.
  • Explore the properties and applications of inverse trigonometric functions in calculus.
  • Review the relationship between derivatives and integrals in the context of trigonometric functions.
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of integration techniques involving inverse trigonometric functions.

escryan
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm just curious as to how

[tex] \int (\frac{1}{1+x^{2}}) dx[/tex]

comes to be

[tex] \tan^{-1} (x)[/tex]


I was able to find the formula on a table of integrals, but I'd just like to know why it works like this, and why we can't use a natural log rule or a substitution method to find this out.

Thanks for reading!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]y=\tan^{-1}x[/tex]

[tex]x=\tan y[/tex] (Implicit Differentiation)

[tex]y'=\frac{1}{\sec^2 y}[/tex]

Substitute with a trig identity and you will see why it's true.
 
Last edited:
You should surely be able to see why using u-substitution with the natural log will not work. My guess is that you are just given that anything in that form is going to be arctan and you will learn how to do this later on with Trigonometric Substitutions.

Remember

[tex] Sin^2(x) + Cos^2(x) = 1[/tex]

and from that

[tex] tan^2(x) + 1 = Sec^2(x)[/tex]

You can these use these identities when you notice that [itex]1+x^2[/itex] in

[tex] \int \frac{1}{1+x^2}[/tex]

can be substituted as [itex]sec^2(x)[/itex]

there is obviously more to it than that, but to get you started.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K