Understanding the Lens Equation: Fish & Pattern Location

  • Thread starter Thread starter meadow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens
AI Thread Summary
An observer will see the fish located at the center of a glass sphere with a radius of 5 cm, but the exact image distance requires knowing the observer's distance from the sphere. The initial approach using the formula i=n-n1/R is incorrect, as it does not properly account for the distances involved. Instead, the correct method involves applying the derived formula for single-surface refraction, which considers distances from the front of the glass. To accurately determine where the observer sees the fish and the decorative pattern, it’s crucial to analyze the refraction of light rays at the glass's surface. Understanding these principles will clarify the image locations without needing the observer's distance.
meadow
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
i just need a little help with a relatively easy lens question

A small fish is cast into the center of a glass sphere of radius R=5 cm and n=1.5. Where will an observer see the fish? Where will the observer see a decorative pattern painted on the back side of a sphere?

So, I thought I could use the formula to find the image distance i=n-n1/R; and i subtracted 1.0 (n of air) from 1.5, then divided by the radius to find the distance of the image of the fish. For the background pattern, I used 10 cm as the value of "R", because it is the length of the diameter away from the observer.
Am I right in my thinking? I feel like I am just plugging and chugging, rather than really understanding the concept...(so i am not sure it i am even evaluating correctly)
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't the image distance (measured from what?)
depend on the location of the object?

You COULD do this with Snell's Law, if you have too much time ...
 
I thought because the fish was placed in the center of the sphere, the distance of the object would be the distance of the radius. I don't, however, know the distance of the observer. Is there a way to explain where the observer would see the fish and the pattern without that distance? How should I approach this problem?
 
( i = n-n/R is obviously incorrect : a distance [meter] is not equal 1/R [1/m] )

If you don't like Snell ...
\frac{n_g}{d_{ob}} - \frac{n_a}{d_{im}} = \frac{n_g - n_a}{R}
should've been derived in your textbook ("single-surface refraction"):
distances are measured from the front of the glass, closest to person.

draw 2 rays from the fish ... are they deflected at the edge of the glass?

draw 2 rays from the back ... are they deflected at the front of the glass?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top