Understanding the Lorentz Equation: Clarifying the Confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the Lorentz equation, specifically the confusion surrounding the term x = vt + x'/γ. The contributor questions whether the last term should be x'γ instead of x'/γ, arguing that x' is already contracted in the frame O. A suggestion is made to consult the Wikipedia page on length contraction for clarification. The need for a detailed breakdown of the derivation steps is emphasized to address specific points of confusion. Understanding the Lorentz equation is crucial for grasping the principles of relativity.
Aziza
Messages
189
Reaction score
1
I am confused of how to derive the Lorentz equation x = vt+x'/γ...if x' is the distance to an event according to O' and x is the distance to that same event according to O, then shouldn't the last term be x'γ not x'/γ, since x' is already contracted according to O, so to relate it to x, we would need to lengthen x' by the factor γ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A bit hard to answer without seeing the full text of whatever source you're looking at.
Try http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_contraction. If you find you have the same issue there, please indicate exactly which step bothers you.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top