Understanding the mechanism of capillarity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahmed Abdullah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanism of capillarity, specifically the rise of liquids in narrow tubes. It highlights the role of surface tension, where liquid molecules exert forces on the wall of the capillary tube, and the wall responds with an equal and opposite force. The conversation questions why these forces do not cancel each other out, leading to a rise in liquid levels, unlike other scenarios where equilibrium is established without movement. The phenomenon of capillarity is attributed to the adhesion of liquid molecules to the tube walls, which overcomes gravitational forces. Ultimately, the attraction between liquid molecules and the wall is weaker than the cohesive forces among the liquid molecules themselves, facilitating the rise.
Ahmed Abdullah
Messages
203
Reaction score
3
I can't convince myself that I understand the mechanism of capillarity- the rise and the drop of liquid level.
For conveniene I am just talking about liquids that rises up liquids that form acute contact angle.
Now Liquid molecules on the surface (in contact of gas) exert a force on the wall (of capilary tube) due to surface tension. According to Newtons third law the wall also exert an equal and opposite force on the molecules in contact. These molecules are also attracted by a same force by their neibouring molecules some are exactly behind. For every pull forward there is a molecule behind to counterbalance. I mean these two force should cancel each other, if so then we should not observe the rise...

the book on the table feels a reaction force upward due to its weight, but it does not rises up. Same idea. The molecules in contact with the wall are constantly under the force, it is exerting on the wall. The wall only does something to make things steady. But why there is a rise?

Another example; suppose a car is decending from an inclined plane(friction free) with an inclination of (90-θ). It is connected with a wall standing upright with a rope. The car is decending and the wall is on the top. Suppose the angle between the wall and rope is an acute angle θ and the pull of the car is F(including mgsinθ). So accordingly the car feels an upward pull Fcosθ due to Newton's third law. But we don't observe the car rising up or even a sign of it, to be more precise the car don't even feel a net upward force for a single moment. And this result isn't surpring. But the result of tension force goes on suprising me!

Now my question is what is the difference between the pull of the car on the wall (due to gravitation and car engine) and the pull on the wall by liquids due to surface tension.

The first case estabilishes an equilibrium the latter gives rise to a rise.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Capillarity is the phenomenon of liquid moving up a narrow tube against the force of gravity. It is caused by the adhesion of the liquid to the walls of the tube. The liquid sticks to the wall and is pulled up by the force of gravity and the adhesion of the liquid to the wall.

Capillary action is caused by the attraction between the molecules of the liquid and the molecules of the wall. The attraction is called the cohesive forces. The attraction between the molecules of the liquid and those of the wall is less than the attraction between the molecules of the liquid and the molecules of the liquid.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top