Understanding the Pendulum Dynamics Equation for a Cart

  • Thread starter Thread starter zoom1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the pendulum dynamics equation for a cart, specifically how it relates to the forces acting on the center of mass of the rod. The equation involves terms for tangential acceleration (##\ddot\theta##) and radial (centripetal) acceleration (##\dot\theta^2##), which are derived from basic principles of force and acceleration. There is clarification that the length of the rod should be considered as 2l instead of l in the equation. Additionally, the centripetal force is noted to act radially, but the equation specifically addresses the force component in the x direction. Overall, the discussion aims to clarify the relationship between these forces and their representation in the equation.
zoom1
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
pendulum2.png


InvertedPendulum_SystemModeling_eq17002.png


Didn't get this equation which is written for the pendulum part of the cart.
Must be easy but couldn't get it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is just "force = mass x acceleration" in the x direction, for the center of mass of the rod. (The length of rod isn't shown on your diagram, but if the equation is correct it is 2l, not l).

The ##\ddot\theta## term is from the tangential acceleration of the rod.

The ##\dot\theta^2## term is the from the radial (centripetal) accleration.
 
AlephZero said:
It is just "force = mass x acceleration" in the x direction, for the center of mass of the rod. (The length of rod isn't shown on your diagram, but if the equation is correct it is 2l, not l).

The ##\ddot\theta## term is from the tangential acceleration of the rod.

The ##\dot\theta^2## term is the from the radial (centripetal) accleration.

It's a little clearer now, but didn't understand the centripetal force component.

Isn't it

df86712e000fe347516b8f39b9490815.png
 
Yes.

You also know ##v = \omega r## and ##\omega = \dot\theta##

The centripetal force is radial (along the length of the rod), but the equation is for the component of the force in the X direction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top