B Understanding the Physics of a Loop de Loop on a Level Track

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter patrykh18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loop
AI Thread Summary
In a level track with a loop de loop, both gravity and the normal force contribute to the centripetal force required for circular motion. At the bottom of the loop, the normal force must exceed gravitational force to create the necessary centripetal acceleration. This imbalance occurs because the cart is transitioning from linear motion to circular motion, requiring additional force to maintain the circular path. The track remains level, but the dynamics change as the cart enters the loop. Understanding this force interaction is crucial for analyzing motion in circular paths.
patrykh18
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
Imagine you have a level track with a loop de loop on it. The loop de loop is shaped like a perfect circle. You are inside the cart and approaching the loop de loop.

I know that gravity and the normal force both act to produce the centripetal force. However at the very bottom of the track the normal force and gravity are in opposite direction if the track is level. Since you start going in a circle at the bottom of the loop there has to be an imbalance of forces. So the normal force at the bottom of the loop must be greater than the force of gravity. My question is how is that possible at the instant you are at the bottom of the loop if the track is level.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't you only start going in circles when the track stops being level?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and CWatters
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top