Understanding the Physics of Elastic Collisions on a 45 Degree Slope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the physics of elastic collisions when a ball strikes a 45-degree slope. Key points include the role of forces at the moment of collision, specifically the normal force acting perpendicular to the slope and gravity. It is clarified that the velocity vector can be redirected without the force vector being parallel to it, and that the speed remains constant if energy is conserved. The conversation also touches on the concept of reaction forces being perpendicular to the surface upon impact. Overall, the principles of vector components and energy conservation are emphasized in understanding the collision dynamics.
Joans
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
How physics works when falling ELASTIC ball hits 45 degree slope?

At point of colision what forces are working? As do I believe- in time delta t- one force as moment was straght with y axis(prependicular to ground) and Normal force( or how do u call it) witch is prependicular to 45 degree slope? And then sum of vectors would be parallel to x axis? How?? When moment after colision would be also parallel to x axis? And speed before colision and after would be same? How to show this in equations hm?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the only force (besides gravity) is the Normal, which is prependicular to 45 degree slope as you said. i am not sure what you ment by the force on the y axis, velocity? gravity? anyway the sum of the vectors doesn't have to be parallel to the x-axis in order for the ball's velocity to be parralel to the x axis, the forces basicly "move" the velocity vector (which has nothing to do with the force vector) in 90 degrees (if the gravity is ignored) the speed should remain the same if energy is coserved.

hope i helped.
 
Okay, I figured out it, thanks
 
edoarad said:
the only force (besides gravity) is the Normal, which is prependicular to 45 degree slope as you said. ... the forces basicly "move" the velocity vector (which has nothing to do with the force vector) in 90 degrees (if the gravity is ignored) the speed should remain the same if energy is coserved.

hope i helped.

Hi I am having a small fight with a work college and have searched high and low on google and this is about as close as I've gotten to an answer!

So, what your saying is if a ball hits a surface on an angle richochettes off at the opposite angle same velocity. the force (reaction seen by the surface) will be perpendicular to the surface?

And Hence if you were applying the Force from an impact of a rock on a bin wall (assuming no friction) that hit the wall on an angle you would apply the component of the force that acts perpendicular to the wall. Not in the direction that the rock was falling.
 

Attachments

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top