Understanding the Potential of a Conducting Sphere Lowered into a Conducting Can

  • Thread starter Thread starter conquerer7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the concept of electric potential in the context of a charged conducting sphere lowered into a conducting can. It explains that the potential of the can increases as it balances the sphere's charge, transitioning from V = 0 to V > 0. The potential of the sphere is altered, but its exact change is unpredictable due to the shielding effect of the can. The potential refers to the work per unit charge needed to bring a charge to the surface of the can, which is relative to the sphere's influence. Overall, the interaction between the sphere and can highlights the complexities of electric potential in conductive systems.
conquerer7
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
What do they mean when they refer to it? The PE of a system, I get, and the potential of a point is the work per unit charge needed to bring a charge there, assuming the charge has no effect on the field (right?).

A small conducting sphere originally has a charge +q. The sphere is lowered into a conducting can. Which of the following quantities are fixed as the sphere is lowered?
A. Potential of the can
B. Potential of the sphere
C. Charge on the sphere
D. Net charge on sphere and can

When they say 'potential of the can', do they mean the amount of work per unit charge needed to bring charge to its surface? If so, is that ignoring the contribution to the E field of the sphere? Is this potential relative to something? Relative to the sphere? Do they mean the potential energy in the sphere-can system?

Thanks for helping me sort this out!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
conquerer7 said:
What do they mean when they refer to it? The PE of a system, I get, and the potential of a point is the work per unit charge needed to bring a charge there, assuming the charge has no effect on the field (right?).

A small conducting sphere originally has a charge +q. The sphere is lowered into a conducting can. Which of the following quantities are fixed as the sphere is lowered?
A. Potential of the can
B. Potential of the sphere
C. Charge on the sphere
D. Net charge on sphere and can

When they say 'potential of the can', do they mean the amount of work per unit charge needed to bring charge to its surface? If so, is that ignoring the contribution to the E field of the sphere? Is this potential relative to something? Relative to the sphere? Do they mean the potential energy in the sphere-can system?

Thanks for helping me sort this out!

The electric potential means what you think it means (i.e. it it defined at a point in space) It's just that these objects are conductors, which means that the potential has to be the same everywhere on them. Thus we can speak of the potential "of the can."
 
Alright, that makes sense. Is this reasoning right?

The potential of the can is raised, since negative charge moves to the inside to balance out the sphere's charge and positive charge moves to the outside. The can was at V = 0 previously because it was uncharged, but now V > 0.

The potential of the sphere is changed, but in an unpredictable way: the field it created is shielded by the can at points outside the can, but this field may be different.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top