Understanding the Properties of EM Waves: Polarization, Coherence, and More

AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic (EM) waves exhibit properties like polarization, which refers to the direction of the electric field, and coherence, indicating a phase relationship. The discussion raises questions about the nature of single photons, specifically whether they are always polarized and how their electric field orientation behaves during travel. It clarifies that photons and EM waves are different representations of the same phenomenon, with photons being massless particles carrying energy and momentum. Additionally, the conversation touches on the uncertainty in quantum mechanics regarding how photons travel, suggesting that their behavior may be described by a probabilistic wave function. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the fundamental nature of light and its interactions.
JAL
There are many properties of EM Waves that can be seen as some kind of ordered distribution of energy in space and time. I can think of a few:

- Polarization: Direction of the electric field in space.
- Coherence: Some kind of phase relationship

My questions are:
- How does a single photon travel? Is a single photon always polarized?, ie, is the electric field of a photon always in a single direction, does it rotate with time and travel in like a helix or does the orientation of the electric field just a probability?

- Is the electric field in phase with the magnetic field? I found contradicting info on this. See http://www.play-hookey.com/optics/transverse_electromagnetic_wave.html

Thanks you.

JAL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't there a difference between a photon and an electromagnetic wave? I thought a photon was simply a massless(invariant mass)particle that carries energy which is equal to Plank's Constant times the frequency of the CORRESPONDING ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE, and that this particle also carries momentum which is equal to it's energy divided by c, and that an electromagnetic wave's energy was spread through out the whole wave which is made oscillating electric and magnetic fields. The photon isn't made of an oscillating electromagnetic field, is it?
 
Nope, EM wave and photons are the different sides of the same entity of Electromagnetic radiation, AKA light.

Also, my knowledge of QM is rusty on this, but as far as quantum theory exists, we don't know the way in which photons travel between observation as a matter of quantum uncertainty. We know that it is represented by a probabilistic wave function that gives how likely it is to appear in a certain place, which then collapses down to whatever we detect upon measurement.
 
Would what we think as an electromagnetic wave be similar to the probabilistic wave function that each photon has when unobserved?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top