Understanding the Relationship Between Net Work and Particle Speed"

  • Thread starter Thread starter m_scott
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
AI Thread Summary
If the net work done on a particle is zero, its speed remains constant, indicating that no external forces are acting on it to change its energy. The work-energy principle states that the work done is equal to the change in kinetic energy; thus, zero work implies no change in kinetic energy. In scenarios where a particle moves in a circular path, its speed at the beginning and end of the path remains the same, despite potential variations in kinetic energy during the motion. This highlights that while the particle's speed can fluctuate temporarily, the overall effect of zero net work results in a constant speed over time. Therefore, the relationship between net work and particle speed is crucial in understanding motion dynamics.
m_scott
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the net work done on a particle is zero, what can be said about its speed. And why?



The Attempt at a Solution


is the speed also zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
actually i think its speed be constant? cause no work is being applied.
 
The work done in a system is the sum of the kinetic and potential energy of the system. In the case of a particle in a field, we'll consider the particle as the system and the work done by a field as an external influence on the particle.

As such, if the work done by the field is zero, the final kinetic energy of the particle is constant. That means, if over the course of time, the particle is made to follow a circular path, at the beginning and the end of that path, the kinetic energy and thus the speed will be the same. However, during the course of the path, i.e. in the middle of the circle, the kinetic energy may vary.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top