Understanding the Relationship Between Satellite Properties and Orbit Radius

  • Thread starter Thread starter dheath90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how the properties of a satellite in a circular Earth orbit depend on the orbital radius r. Key properties include the orbital period, kinetic energy, angular momentum, and speed, each of which has a specific mathematical relationship with r. The orbital period is independent of eccentricity, while kinetic energy depends on velocity and mass. Participants suggest referring to key equations from textbooks to understand these relationships better. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of basic orbital mechanics in solving the problem.
dheath90
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A satellite is in a circular Earth orbit of radius r. The area A enclosed by the orbit depends on r2 because A = πr2. Determine how the following properties of the satellite depend on r. In each case, give the power of r, i.e., if the dependence goes as rn, give n. If there is no dependence, then n = 0. (a) period, (b) kinetic energy, (c) angular momentum, and (d) speed.

I do not understand how to do this problem at all.

Help please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This belongs in the homework section.

The question is fairly straight forward, how does orbital radius affect each of the four items? That is what you should do to start with.

Jared
 
dheath90 said:
A satellite is in a circular Earth orbit of radius r. The area A enclosed by the orbit depends on r2 because A = πr2. Determine how the following properties of the satellite depend on r. In each case, give the power of r, i.e., if the dependence goes as rn, give n. If there is no dependence, then n = 0. (a) period, (b) kinetic energy, (c) angular momentum, and (d) speed.

I do not understand how to do this problem at all.

Help please!

Orbital mechanics is kind of my bread and butter. However, some users believe this to belong in the homework section. That being said, it has not been moved yet, so I will proceed cautiously.

I have given this problem in two formats before.
  • using the six orbital elements
  • using basic gravitation formulae

If we are assuming a simple planar orbit with definable period, then the problem can be solved with basic orbital mechanics. Again, given that this might belong in the homework section, I will be very cautious in my recommendation:

Your textbook is likely to define about four key equations that relate these variables. A hint for you is this: orbital period is not dependent upon eccentricity and kinetic energy is only dependent upon velocity and mass of the orbital object.

Since you are speaking of orbital periods, it is unlikely that you must consider the true anomaly.

Given that I cannot solve this for you, I suggest you look in your text for the four key equations relating these variables.

Heh, lastly, don't worry... no one's asking you to solve the N-body problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top