Understanding the Role of k in the Wavefunction of Quantum Systems

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Arman777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms Wavefunction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of the variable ##k## in the wavefunction of quantum systems, specifically in the context of the integral representation of wavefunctions as presented in a textbook by Stephen Gasiorowicz. Participants explore the implications of ##k##, its relationship to momentum, and the mathematical structure of wavefunctions in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about why the wavefunction is a function of ##k## and the significance of integrating over ##k##, questioning whether ##k## represents momentum.
  • One participant clarifies that ##k## is a dummy variable for integration and that the functions ##e^{i(kx - ωt)}## form a continuous basis for wavefunctions.
  • A comparison is made between the continuous case of integration over ##k## and the discrete case of summation over eigenfunctions.
  • Another participant suggests that ##k## represents momentum for the eigenfunction, while also questioning the terminology of wavenumber.
  • Some participants acknowledge the difficulty of grasping these concepts and mention supplementary resources, such as MIT videos, to aid their understanding.
  • One participant summarizes the idea that the wavefunction can be viewed as a combination of all possible wavefunctions in momentum space.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the integral representation is a way to express the wavefunction in a more computationally manageable form.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express confusion and uncertainty regarding the interpretation of ##k##, with some agreeing on its connection to momentum while others remain unclear. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the terminology or the conceptual understanding of ##k##.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the topic and the potential for varying interpretations of ##k##, indicating that the discussion may depend on specific definitions and contexts within quantum mechanics.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
I am reading a textbook quantum physics by stephen gasiorowicz. And he defines a wavefunction in this form,

$$Ψ(x,t)=\int_{-∞}^{∞}A(k)e^{i:(kx-ωt)}dk$$

I did not understand why its a function of ##k## or why even we are taking integral with respect to ##k## ? Is ##k## actually means momentum somehow ? Or what's the importance of ##k## since we the wavefunction is actually a function of ##x## and ##t##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arman777 said:
I am reading a textbook quantum physics by stephen gasiorowicz. And he defines a wavefunction in this form,

$$Ψ(x,t)=\int_{-∞}^{∞}A(k)e^{i:(kx-ωt)}dk$$

I did not understand why its a function of ##k## or why even we are taking integral with respect to ##k## ? Is ##k## actually means momentum somehow ? Or what's the importance of ##k## since we the wavefunction is actually a function of ##x## and ##t##.

It's not a function of ##k##. ##k## is a dummy variable over which the integration is done.

The set of functions ##e^{i(kx - wt)}##, ##k \in \mathbb{R}##, is an uncountable (or continuous) basis for the space of wavefunctions.

Mathematically you integrate over a "density" function ##A(k)##, which essentially gives you the weighing for each eigenfunction in your expansion.

You should compare what you have with the discrete case:
$$\Psi(x, t) = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}A_n f_n(x, t)$$
Your equation is the continuous version of this.

The comparison is: sum over ##n## (discrete case) against integral over ##k## (continuous case).
 
Last edited:
##k## is not a wavenumber right ? I understand what you said I guess but its still confusing for me somehow
 
Arman777 said:
##k## is not a wavenumber right ? I understand what you said I guess but its still confusing for me somehow

##k## represents the momentum for that particular eigenfunction. Whether you also want to call that a wavenumber? I would go with the terminology in your book.

I think it isn't that easy to grasp. The important thing is that physically you always have a range of ##k##, hence a wave-packet.
 
I agree that it is not easy. I am watching some MIT videos to understand it. And later on I ll get back to you
 
I guess I understand it. Its the adding the all possible wavefunctions in momentum space and getting some new wavefunction.
 
Arman777 said:
I guess I understand it. Its the adding the all possible wavefunctions in momentum space and getting some new wavefunction.
Yep, although it might be better to think of ##\Psi(x,t)## as the wavefunction of some physical system (not a "new" wavefunction) and the integral is a way of rewriting it in a more computationally tractable form, a sum of momentum eigenfunctions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
11K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K