Understanding the Scale 1:10 of a Circular Model Railway Track

  • Thread starter Thread starter davedave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scale
davedave
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Because I cannot draw a picture in this problem, I will do my best to describe it in words.

This problem is about a circular railway track. The diagram that goes with it shows one of the 15 curved pieces. Its width is MEASURED 1 cm and its arc length of the inner edge is MEASURED 30 cm.

The circular model railway track is made by connecting the 15 identical pieces. When the 15 pieces are assembled, the circumference of the inner edge is 450 cm. The radius of the inner edge is 71.6 cm. So, the scale used in the DIAGRAM is 1:10.

I don't understand why the scale for the diagram is 1:10.

Can someone please explain?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's just saying that the drawing is \frac{1}{10}th the size of what it would be in real life. It's giving an aspect of scale. So each CM is actually represented by a millimeter in the drawing.
 
Can you grab on of the pieces and put right on top of its diagram? Is the drawing the same size as the actual piece? If so, the drawing's scale is 1:1 ...if the drawing is a lot smaller than the actual piece (10 times smaller) that it is 1:10
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top