Understanding the Speed of Bullet and Bomb Blasts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the initial speed dynamics of bullets and bomb blasts, noting that both start from zero velocity and accelerate to a maximum speed very quickly. The initial phase is described as "slow," but this term can lead to confusion due to its subjectivity. The maximum speed is reached near the end of the barrel for bullets, indicating a short distance and time for acceleration. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise language when discussing these phenomena to avoid misunderstandings. Overall, the participants confirm their understanding of the speed changes without needing to delve into additional complexities.
brbrown
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Could someone please clarify if my understanding of the following is correct or not?
When a bullet is fired from a gun or a bomb explodes, I thought I had read somewhere that, in the first few microseconds, the speed of the bullet or bomb blast is slow at first then increases to a maximum, eventually slowing down if nothing other than air resistance or gravity impedes its progress.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the confusion? It's pretty easy to see with the bullet that it starts from zero velocity. That's pretty slow. Any noncontinuous change in velocity would require an infinite acceleration. It follows that it must start "slow" and increase to a maximum. This maximum is very near the end of the muzzle, which means a very short distance and a very short time.

When you use subjective terms like "slow," "at first," and "eventually" it's easy to become confused, because they don't really define anything.
 
If you had a very long barrel it would start slowing down in the barrel.
 
How long? How much fuel / propellant?
 
S_Happens said:
What is the confusion? It's pretty easy to see with the bullet that it starts from zero velocity. That's pretty slow. Any noncontinuous change in velocity would require an infinite acceleration. It follows that it must start "slow" and increase to a maximum. This maximum is very near the end of the muzzle, which means a very short distance and a very short time.

When you use subjective terms like "slow," "at first," and "eventually" it's easy to become confused, because they don't really define anything.

Hello S Happens. Thanks for the reply. I don't really have any confusion. I just wanted to make sure I was right before I pursue another related matter. Thanks for the help.
Hello Atomic Joe and Sophiecentaur, I can see those points would have an effect but not needed for my purpose. Thank you both. Brian
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top