Understanding Torque in Wheel Stopping: A Quick Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter ProSk8ter474
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
To determine how long it takes to stop a wheel with a radius of 1.56 m and an initial velocity of 200 rad/min under a constant torque of 10,000 NM, the relationship between torque, moment of inertia, and angular acceleration must be applied. The equation T = Iα indicates that angular acceleration (α) can be calculated using the torque and moment of inertia. The discussion highlights a miscalculation in assuming a value for angular acceleration without incorporating torque or radius. Proper application of angular kinematics requires knowing angular acceleration to find the time to stop the wheel. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately solving the problem.
ProSk8ter474
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
There's a question that asks: if a wheel with 1.56 m/rad radius which reached a final velocity of 200 rad/min(or 10/3 rad/s) were slowed down with a constant torque of 10,000 NM being applied, how long would it take to stop the wheel. I can't seem to find how torque is related to this problem in anyway. I can solve it by doing the following:

Angular Displacement = (W^2-Wo^2)/(2*Angular Acceleration)
= (11.11rad^2/s^2)/(4.44rad/s^2)
= 2.5 rad
Angular Displacement = (t/2)(Wo+W)
=(2.5 rad) = (t/2)*(10/3rad/s)
=(2.5 rad)/(3.33rad/s)
= .75s = (t/2)
t = 1.5 s

But it may not be correct because I didn't use the radius or torque in that problem. Please respond with your ideas on how they could be applied to this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for now: T= torque A= angular acceleration I= moment of inertia

T=IA so A=T/I

now use the angular acceleration in an angular kentmatics problem with final angular velocity =0
 
ProSk8ter474 said:
... I can solve it by doing the following:

Angular Displacement = (W^2-Wo^2)/(2*Angular Acceleration)
= (11.11rad^2/s^2)/(4.44rad/s^2)
= 2.5 rad
You are for some reason assuming a value (of 2.22 rad/s^2) for the angular acceleration. Where did that come from?

If you had the angular acceleration, you wouldn't bother calculating the angular displacement--you'd immediately calculate the time given that you know the Δω.
But it may not be correct because I didn't use the radius or torque in that problem.
That should give you a hint that something's wrong! :rolleyes:

As Chi Meson explained, you need to apply Newton's 2nd law for rotation to find α, α = Τ/I.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top