Understanding Torque on a Solenoid: An Explanation and Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter schaefera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solenoid Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the torque experienced by a solenoid and why it does not cancel out despite the opposing forces on its sides. It is clarified that while individual loops may produce opposing torques, the magnitudes differ due to angles, resulting in a net torque that does not cancel. Each pair of forces creates a couple that contributes to a consistent torque direction throughout the solenoid. The total torque for a solenoid with multiple turns can be calculated by summing the torque contributions from each turn, leading to a resultant torque vector directed into the page. This explanation aligns with experimental observations of solenoids in magnetic fields, confirming the theoretical understanding.
schaefera
Messages
208
Reaction score
0
I'm looking at this picture from part of an explanation of the torque on a coil of current arranged as a solenoid: http://www.physics.sjsu.edu/becker/physics51/images/28_30_Torgue_on_solenoid.jpg

Now, they claim that the torque is directed into the page, but I can't understand why. I agree that the torque of an individual current loop about its center would be into the page, but if we're trying to find the torque about the center of the entire solenoid, I seem to think that the total torques should cancel out.

Here's my reasoning. The force on the left side of the wires will point up, and the force on the right side points down, in accordance with the right hand rule. Now, getting the torque on, say, the top left corner, we find that it points out of the page due to τ= r x F and by the same equation, the torque due to the top right corner of the solenoid points into the page. This would happen for each loop in the solenoid, so shouldn't the torques cancel? Why can we treat the entire solenoid as a single current loop, and multiply by the of turns in it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I seem to think that the total torques should cancel out.
You can tell the torques should not cancel out because the solenoid acts as a magnet - and you know that a magnet will rotate in an external magnetic field.
On top of this, we can actually put an actual solenoid into a magnetic field and measure the net torque ... so your argument is saying that your current understanding of the theory predicts something that is contradicted by experiment.

Here's my reasoning. The force on the left side of the wires will point up, and the force on the right side points down, in accordance with the right hand rule. Now, getting the torque on, say, the top left corner, we find that it points out of the page due to τ= r x F and by the same equation, the torque due to the top right corner of the solenoid points into the page. This would happen for each loop in the solenoid, so shouldn't the torques cancel?
If you draw the vectors, you'll find the "top left" torque is a different magnitude to the "top right" torque. They don't cancel. The right-hand one is bigger than the left-hand one.
(Even though the forces are the same, they are at different angles to the moment arm.)

Take another look at the torque from the element of loop top-left ... the force points up, the angle means the torque is slightly anti-clock.

Now look at the bottom right element ... the force is pointing down, the angles are the same but complimentary, so it produces the same magnitude torque, and in the same direction ... these two elements create a couple. So they add together.

Now sum all the couples up and down the solenoid.
 
The torque on each turn is clockwise as we look at the diagram, that is the torque vector, G, for each turn is into the page. I think we agree over this.

But the particular torque experienced by each turn is due to a couple, equivalent to a pair of equal and opposite forces not in the same straight line. It's easy to show that the torque due to a couple is the same about any point. So torques due to individual turns can simply be added, without worrying about what point the torques are taken about. The resultant torque vector for an N turn coil is therefore simply NG, even if the turns are 'staggered' over a distance.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top