Understanding Tree and Potato Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpicyRamen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass potato Tree
AI Thread Summary
A tree's mass primarily comes from carbon, but this concept applies to the entire tree, not just the trunk. In the context of a potato submerged in water, the increase in mass is due to the absorption of water, which contributes to the total mass of the potato. The distinction between weight and mass is clarified: weight is mass multiplied by gravitational force, and any increase in weight indicates an increase in mass. The discussion also differentiates between biomass, which includes all living matter and biological water, and fixed carbon, which refers specifically to carbon derived from CO2 that forms part of the plant's structure. In plants, including potatoes, fixed carbon is calculated by measuring the dry weight minus any minerals. It is noted that trees can contain a significant amount of water, sometimes up to 70% of their mass, which is essential for understanding their overall composition.
SpicyRamen
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I learned in Ap Bio that a tree's mass comes from carbon.It makes sense, but is it the whole tree or just the trunk of the tree? Cuz I took a Practice Ap test and there involved a question with a piece of potatoe in Water. At first I assumed that it was diffusion or osmosis that occurred but it said it's mass increased. Wouldn't absorbing water increase just it's weight? How did it's mass increase? Cuz Potatoe is a type of root is it built upon carbon like the trunk of a tree? And since it was in water, not to mention it's a root, how would the potatoe take in the carbon? It's only the beginning of the year so maybe I haven't learned enough yet to comprehend but could someone explain this to me? Thanks in Advance
 
Biology news on Phys.org
What do you mean by this:
Wouldn't absorbing water increase just it's weight?
The weight of an object is defined as its mass multiplied by a gravitational field strength constant. This is the same everywhere on earth, and does not change in time. So, a change in an objects weight implies a change in the objects mass.
 
I phrased that wrong. What I meant was for both of them to be separate variables. When I read the problem i assumed they meant the mass of the potatoe alone. If water was absorbed by the slice of potatoe it wouldn't be considered part of the potatoes mass would it?
 
You are confusing biomass, concept of mass as cristo describes, and fixed carbon.

Duirect answer: potato water counts for the mass of the potato. A potato does not have "biomass", just fixed carbon. When you get on the bathroom scale just after drinking two glasses of water, you count the mass of the water, too.

Biomass is the total mass of living organisms in a biotic system. Includes biological water, minerals, etc. Not just carbon compounds.

Fixed carbon is carbon derived from CO2 found as simple sugars and their metabolites. The energy to fix carbon dioxide comes from sunlight, or in ocean trenches from oxidizing metals from deep sea vents. Further metabolizing creates other carbon compounds like protein or fat or ...

The mass of fixed carbon is the dry weight of an organism minus any mineralization. In plants this could be lithocysts, like silicates in horsetails. Because of minerals what early researchers did was:
1. get a oven dry weight of a piece of tissue, or the whole plant
2. oxidize it to remove all carbon
3. weigh the ash.

Then total fixed carbon = dry weight - ash

In a potato, there is no biomass in the strict sense of the word, just fixed carbon.
Trees contain huge amounts of water, as much as 70% of a live tree's mass is water, depending on species.
 
Last edited:
Oh Ok Thanks Cristo and Mcnamara ^_^"
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
I use ethanol for cleaning glassware and resin 3D prints. The glassware is sometimes used for food. If possible, I'd prefer to only keep one grade of ethanol on hand. I've made sugar mash, but that is hardly the least expensive feedstock for ethanol. I had given some thought to using wheat flour, and for this I would need a source for amylase enzyme (relevant data, but not the core question). I am now considering animal feed that I have access to for 20 cents per pound. This is a...
Back
Top