Understanding Upper Bound & Sup in Theorem Proving

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Upper bound
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
This calc book that I am reading uses words like "upper bound" and "sup" a lot when proving theorems. I have never heared these terms before so it makes it hard for me to understand the proofs.

I think it has to deal with max's values of a graph: For example given a set S of all elements c in a ≤ c ≤ b would the the upper bound in the following graph in [a,b] be c? and also c = Sup S...
is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    4.8 KB · Views: 390
Physics news on Phys.org
Upper bound is any value that is greater than or equal to all the values in a set.

sup is short for supremum, the least upper bound of a set of numbers. The range of a function might be such a set. The supremum is not necessarily a member of the set: for example, the supremum of the range of the sigmoid function \frac{1}{1+e^{-x}} is 1, but that is not a value of the function. 1 is an upper bound to this function, but so are 2, 100 and 100!2
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top