Understanding Velocity, Acceleration, and Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the application of four key equations related to velocity and acceleration, which are valid only under conditions of uniform acceleration. Each equation serves a specific purpose, such as calculating final velocity, distance traveled, or time, depending on the known and unknown variables in a given problem. It's emphasized that these equations cannot be used if acceleration is not constant, as indicated by a non-linear graph of acceleration versus time. Participants suggest a systematic approach: identify known quantities, desired outcomes, and select the appropriate equation accordingly. Overall, clarity on when to use each equation is crucial for solving problems effectively in physics.
The_Z_Factor
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
This doesn't involve a problem, but I am confused on another part involving velocities and acceleration and such..

My book gives me 4 equations, the first one is:
final Velocity=initial Velocity + (acceleration)(time)

The second one:
distance traveled=(intial Velocity + final Velocity)/2

The third:
distance traveled=(intial Velocity)(time)+1/2(acceleration)(time)squared


And the final:
final Velocity squared=(initial Velocity)squared+2(acceleration)(distance)


My question is, under what circumstances are each equation used? My book gives several problems but it uses all of these without really explaining how to use each one, or under which scenario we use each one..like for example, if I want to find the time it takes to go x distance, traveling at s velocity and accelerating at a, then which one would I use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the example you gave, then you would use the third equation.
It would be a good idea to set out your work like this:

First write down all the quantities you are given, or can deduce, with their values. Then write down all the quantities you want to find. Now you must look for the relevant equation. Look at all the things you know AND the thing you want to find. Find the equation that relates all the quantities you know AND want. This will be the equation you must use. You may need to re-arrange the equate so that you can get the quantity you want.
 
The_Z_Factor said:
This doesn't involve a problem, but I am confused on another part involving velocities and acceleration and such..

My book gives me 4 equations, the first one is:
final Velocity=initial Velocity + (acceleration)(time)

The second one:
distance traveled=(intial Velocity + final Velocity)/2

The third:
distance traveled=(intial Velocity)(time)+1/2(acceleration)(time)squared


And the final:
final Velocity squared=(initial Velocity)squared+2(acceleration)(distance)


My question is, under what circumstances are each equation used? My book gives several problems but it uses all of these without really explaining how to use each one, or under which scenario we use each one..like for example, if I want to find the time it takes to go x distance, traveling at s velocity and accelerating at a, then which one would I use?

All these equations are valid only for uniform acceleration. So if you have a car travels at 100mph one second 101 the next, and 104 the next, then it isn't uniforming accelerating so you cannot use the above equations.
If however the car was traveling for 0 to 100m/s^2 and accelerated uniformly at 2m/s^2 then you could use the above equations.

To put it simply if the acceleration when plotted versus times is a curve the equations can't be used. If the acceleration versus time is a straight line then the equations can be used.
 
gspeechc, thanks for that advice, I am sure itll probably help me. Malty, thanks for your input as well, I am just starting on the changing velocities or I guess as you said when the acceleration versus time is curved.
 
You need to take into acount what it is that you are looking for and what variables you are given. If you plug the given information into an equation and what are you are looking for is the only unknown left in the equation, I would say you have chosen wisely.

Casey
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top