Understanding Velocity-Time Graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter iceman021
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
AI Thread Summary
Understanding velocity-time graphs involves estimating the slope of the original graphs to determine their shape, even without specific data. The lack of marked units on the original graphs allows for flexibility in creating new graphs without the need for units. This approach simplifies the problem for beginners, making it easier to grasp the concept. Overall, focusing on the slopes rather than exact values is key to solving these types of problems. Engaging with the community can provide additional insights and support for learners.
iceman021
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am new to this site, so please forgive any issues that I have.

I know that this is a simplistic problem to solve, but I do not understand how I am supposed to solve it without any sort of data.

http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/7504/snapshot20090903181722.tif

Thank you for any help given, it is much appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi iceman021! Welcome to PF! :wink:
iceman021 said:
… I do not understand how I am supposed to solve it without any sort of data.

They only want the shape of the velocity-time graphs, so just estimate the slope of the original graphs. :smile:

(after all, there are no units marked on the original graphs, so they can't complain if you put no units on the new graphs! :wink:)
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Finding acceleration from Velocity vs Position graph
Replies
2
Views
4K
Understanding a Velocity-Time Graph
Replies
14
Views
5K
Is the Answer Sheet Wrong? A Closer Look at Velocity-Time Graphs
Replies
7
Views
1K
Inconsistency in a Velocity-Time Graph
Replies
13
Views
3K
Finding the Magnetic Field (B_0) on a Graph [NMR]
Replies
6
Views
1K
Confusion Calculating Young's Modulus
Replies
5
Views
2K
Velocity-Time Graph: Dog's Position
Replies
6
Views
3K
Acceleration and Displacement from a Velocity vs. Time Graph
Replies
15
Views
3K
Graph of Position Seems to be Wrong
Replies
6
Views
2K
Interpreting Velocity vs Time Graphs
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top