Understanding Virtual Particles: The Mystery of Annihilation and Energy

Sterj
[SOLVED] virtual particles

If there is createn a virtual pair (anti particle A and its particle B) in vacuum what are they doing in their life time? Is A always at the same position like B or how can they annihilate? And if they annihilate, what's with the energy (does it disappear)? Has the anti particle negativ energy?

I hope you can answer this questions :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Due to a manifestation of the canonical commutation relations, we have

\Delta E \Delta t \ge \frac{h}{4\pi}

which means that in an ever decreasing short amount of time, the uncertainty of the energy increases. If \Delta t is small enough, then \Delta E[/tex] can be big enough for there to be enough energy for a particle-antiparticle pair to be created. Of course, this means that those two particles have to annihilate with each other before \Delta t is over, or if an external source of energy is given to the vacuum to make up for the \Delta E, then the two created particles can live on. The two particles won't generally be in the same position during their lifetimes.
 
Last edited:
Sterj said:
If there is createn a virtual pair (anti particle A and its particle B) in vacuum what are they doing in their life time? Is A always at the same position like B or how can they annihilate?

A virtual particle transfers a definite momentum p, so due to HUP it is everywhere.

And if they annihilate, what's with the energy (does it disappear)?

No, another virtual pair is produced

Has the anti particle negativ energy?

I hope you can answer this questions :smile:
Yes

i urge you to read my journal. I have written several entries on this topic. Check it out
https://www.physicsforums.com/journal.php?s=&action=view&journalid=13790&perpage=10&page=2

Look at the bottom of the page
regards
marlon
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"No, another virtual pair is produced"

That would mean, that the "same" energy is always there?
 
Sterj said:
"No, another virtual pair is produced"

That would mean, that the "same" energy is always there?

Ofcourse, that is the vacuum energy. It is because this energy is non-zero that them vacuum fluctuations and virtual particles exist in the first place

I am sure i have told this before...

marlon
 
But if the same energy is alway there, it takes the energy "sentense" in danger (E1=E2).
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top