Understanding White Noise Behaviour in an Ideal Mixer - SNR Unchanged"

  • Thread starter Thread starter diemilio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Noise
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of white noise when passed through an ideal mixer, specifically regarding the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). It is noted that textbooks suggest the SNR remains unchanged from input to output, which raises questions about the treatment of white noise as composed of in-phase and quadrature components. Participants express confusion over whether these components should have equal power spectral densities and how that relates to the SNR. The consensus is that while the mixer may introduce some noise, the relationship between signal and noise remains consistent across the mixing process. Ultimately, the SNR remains unchanged due to the nature of the mixing operation and the statistical properties of white noise.
diemilio
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I have a question regarding the way white noise behaves when passed through an ideal mixer.

Picture the system shown in the attached image. Assume the mixer is ideal and that the high frequency contents of the multiplication are filtered out. Therefore the output of the system will be A*B/2. My question is, how does wide-band white noise behave when passed through the mixer?

In several textbooks, I've seen that in this system the signal-to-noise ratio remains unchanged from input to output. However, I am confused because I would think that in the case of white noise, it would be possible to express the signal as a composition of in-phase and quadrature components with equal power spectral densities, thus part of the noise should be, phase-filtered.

Is this an unreasonable assumption? Isn't the phase of white noise also white, thus 0º and 90º components are equally probable?

What am I missing here? Why is the SNR unchanged?

Regards,

diemilio
 

Attachments

  • Mixer.png
    Mixer.png
    7.5 KB · Views: 441
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't understand "in-phase and quadrature components with equal power spectral densities". Why do you think they would be equal? (asking, not testing you). I don't think the in-phase and quadrature components are in any way correlated. (I'm not an expert)

Are you thinking that when you mix to zero the resulting pos and neg frequencies add and might cancel? That would only happen to the extent they are correlated.
 
diemilio said:
What am I missing here? Why is the SNR unchanged?

Regards,

diemilio

Why would you expect the SNR to be changed at all (apart from a finite amount of added noise from the mixer)? Every baseband component (signal and noise) will find itself mixed up to a corresponding 'product' component and they should all have the same relationship to each other. Are you looking for something more than that?
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top